CONTRACT WITH AMERICA (1995)
VS. DEMOCRATS SIX FOR 06 (2007)
As Democrats have quickly discovered,
sound bites from the campaign trail dont necessarily translate
into sound legislation. Rather than take the time to craft responsible,
rational legislation, Democrats rushed to the floor a series
of flawed bills designed solely to quickly deliver on campaign
slogans, producing, as the Los Angeles Times put it, errors
by the barrel. To date, none have been signed into law,
and it is unlikely many will.
The substance of the Democrats
first 100 days is, at best, thin, and it particularly suffers
in comparison to the Contract with America put forth by Republicans
after they won the majority in 1995. Where Republicans put forward
a coherent vision of more freedom, smaller government, and a
stronger military, Democrats offer more taxation, more government
regulation, and foreign policy retreat. Where the Contract advanced
one of the most significant reforms of the last half century
welfare reform Democrats are setting the stage
for a reckless withdrawal in the Global War on Terrorism.
On the first day of the 110th
Congress, Speaker-Elect Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) vowed to work together
with Republicans in partnership, not partisanship.
So how does the new majority stack up on the partnership
scale? Republicans are still waiting
In 1995, Republicans promised
swift consideration of 10 broad reform initiatives based on full
and open debate. The 10 Contract initiatives were the basis
of 24 bills, the majority of which were considered during the
first 100 days. Twenty-one of the 24 bills were considered under
an open rule or under suspension. Democrats offered 154 amendments
to those bills, passing 48. Just three Contract bills were considered
under a closed rule. Open debate isnt just about giving
everyone a chance to talk its about giving Members
the opportunity to work together to craft better legislation.
Good public policy cant be enacted if its left on
the cutting room floor.
Last year, as she touted Democrats
Six for 06 plan, then Minority Leader Pelosi
told CongressDaily that her commitment to an open and bipartisan
House was so great she would be willing to lose votes. Its
not about a defeat, its about a decision, she said.
I certainly would not say that we cant bring things
to the floor because well lose. I think you have to be
open to that and whatever the consequence, it is worth it because
it has been the result of free and open debate.
That was then, but when the Democratic
rubber met the legislative road the emptiness of their promises
were revealed. All of the Six for 06 items
were considered under closed rules. Republicans were barred from
offering even a single amendment. So much for good public policy,
and so much for Democratic promises.
In the first 100 days of the
new majority, the record is clear: Democrats talk a good game,
but have not come close to delivering. Speaker Pelosi promised,
in her words, the most open
Congress in history.
So far, the majority she leads has failed utterly to provide
any openness whatsoever. All theyve offered is flawed proposals,
muzzled debate, closed rules, a lack of vision, and empty promises.
All that and no t-shirt, either.
<< WHAT
THEY'RE SAYING: Democrats' Job Performance :: National Security >> |