![]() |
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Sponsors and Collaborators: |
Hamilton Health Sciences Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) |
---|---|
Information provided by: | McMaster University |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00433212 |
The machines and oxygen used to help very premature babies breathe can have side-effects, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Infants with BPD get more complications (a higher death rate, a longer time in intensive care and on assisted ventilation, more hospital readmissions in the first year of life, and more learning problems) than infants who do not develop BPD. Doctors try to remove the tube in the wind-pipe that links the baby to the breathing machine as soon as possible. However, small babies get tired, and still require help to breathe. One of the standard and common techniques to help them breathe without a tube in the wind-pipe is to use simple pressure support, nasal continuous positive airway pressure or nCPAP. This supports breathing a little, but it is often not enough to prevent the need to go back on the breathing machine.
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is similar to nCPAP, but also gives some breaths, or extra support, to babies through a small tube in the nose. NIPPV is safe and effective, and already in use as an alternate "standard" therapy.
The main research question: After being weaned from the breathing machine, is NIPPV better than nCPAP in preventing BPD in premature babies weighing 999 grams or less at birth?
Condition | Intervention | Phase |
---|---|---|
Respiratory Insufficiency of Prematurity |
Device: nCPAP Device: NIPPV |
Phase III |
Study Type: | Interventional |
Study Design: | Prevention, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study |
Official Title: | Efficacy and Safety of NIPPV to Increase Survival Without Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants |
Estimated Enrollment: | 1000 |
Study Start Date: | April 2007 |
Estimated Study Completion Date: | May 2009 |
Estimated Primary Completion Date: | May 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Arms | Assigned Interventions |
---|---|
A: Active Comparator
Non-invasive respiratory support via nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation
|
Device: NIPPV
Deliver non-invasive respiratory support via ventilator with NIPPV device
|
B: Active Comparator
Non-invasive respiratory support via nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
|
Device: nCPAP
Deliver non-invasive respiratory support via ventilator with nCPAP device
|
The immature lung of extremely low birth weight (ELBW, < 1000 g) infants is easily damaged by the placement of an endotracheal tube to deliver mechanical ventilation and oxygen. This and the total time of mechanical ventilation contributes to bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Infants with BPD have an increased risk of later death or neuro-impairment. With the increasing survival of ELBW infants in the NICU, there has been a proportionate increase in the number of infants surviving with BPD.
Following invasive ventilation via an endotracheal tube (ETT), extubation to nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP)ventilation is the standard approach. Currently, 40% of infants who are extubated and given nCPAP support fail, and require re-intubation. Previous work suggests that a less invasive respiratory support such as Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV), without an endotracheal tube is less injurious to the lung. NIPPV may thereby reduce the duration of invasive ventilator support, and aid successful early extubation. We hypothesize that the use of NIPPV leads to a higher rate of survival without BPD than standard therapy with nCPAP.
This randomized clinical trial is appropriately powered to compare NIPPV with nCPAP to detect effects on clinically relevant long-term outcomes, such as death and BPD at 36 weeks. This is a multi-national, randomized, open clinical trial of two different standard methods of providing non-invasive respiratory support to 1000 extremely preterm infants weighing less than 1000 grams at birth.
Ages Eligible for Study: | up to 28 Days |
Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Intention to manage the infant with non-invasive respiratory support (i.e. no endotracheal tube), where either:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contact: Haresh Kirpalani, MD, MSc | 905-527-2299 ext 43790 | kirpalan@mcmaster.ca |
Contact: Brigitte Lemyre, MD | 613-737-8561 | blemyre@ottawahospital.on.ca |
Study Chair: | Haresh Kirpalani, MD, MSc | Hamilton Health Sciences |
Study Director: | Brigitte Lemyre, MD | Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario |
Study Director: | Aaron Chiu, MD | St. Boniface General Hospital Research Centre |
Study Director: | David Millar, MD | Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast |
Study Director: | Robin S Roberts, MTech | Hamilton Health Sciences/McMaster University |
Study Director: | Keith Barrington, MD | Royal Victoria Hospital/McGill University |
Study Director: | Bradley Yoder, MD | University of Utah |
Study Director: | Peter H Dijk, MD, PhD | University Medical Centrum Groningen |
Responsible Party: | McMaster University ( Haresh Kirpalani/Nominated PI ) |
Study ID Numbers: | NTG-2007-NIPPV, CIHR MCT-80246, ISRCTN15233270 |
Study First Received: | February 7, 2007 |
Last Updated: | December 2, 2008 |
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00433212 |
Health Authority: | Canada: Ethics Review Committee |
prematurity respiratory insufficiency non-invasive ventilation bronchopulmonary dysplasia hyaline membrane disease |
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia Body Weight Birth Weight Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Respiratory Insufficiency Respiratory distress syndrome, infant |
Respiratory Tract Diseases Lung Diseases Respiration Disorders Infant, Newborn, Diseases Infant, Premature, Diseases Hyaline Membrane Disease |