On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Kaigai Kohei wrote:

> - Updating the sel_netif_hash table is protected by spinlock_irqsave().
> This method is same as my RCU-patch.

Why use irqsave? This code is never contended from irq context.

> # And, I wondered if 'sel_netif_total' is really necessary.

This prevents the cache from growing without bounds.

• James -- James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.