On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 18:56 -0400, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:
> > ifdef(`has_$1_tmpfs_t', `',
> > type ...
> > define(`has_$1_tmpfs_t', `')
> > ')
>
> So, if this is the only objection to this patch,
> maybe it should be merged - I can submit a followup patch
> to deal with the tmpfs issue - seems like the right thing to do
> is to protect all the type-declaring macros in global-macros.te
> against double inclusion?
>
> I don't see problems being caused by moving the X functionality..
>
> Attached is a resync against Fedora: selinux-policy-strict-1.23.6-3,
> and a table update for the securitylevel tool that fixes a typo,
> and describes the allow_write_xshm boolean.

Ok, there's one problem with it - the allow_write_xshm rules should say: rw_shm_perms and rw_file_perms and not write...

-- 
Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg2@cornell.edu>
Cornell University


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.