On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:11:11PM -0400, Karl MacMillan wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:48 -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> > Karl MacMillan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 10:45 -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote:
> > >
> > >> Karl MacMillan wrote:

<snip>


> > >> is it really necessary to use a char here? granted its smaller but it 

> > >> also doesn't really convey to someone new to the code what is going on. 

> > >> Perhaps a bool typemap? or short int?

> > >>

> > >>     

> > >

> > > Char isn't necessary, though I think it is a common idiom to use char as

> > > boolean in C programs. What do you mean by typemap (typedef?). I don't

> > > really think that short int is any better.

> > >

> > >   

> > 

Using the standard *nix form of returning int is always safe and consistent.

BAPper

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.