Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:

> From a config file whose pathname would be provided by libselinux (ala
> the way in which dbusd imports contexts), or directly as a context
> returned by a libselinux function.

That sounds too SELinux specific. How do I do it so that it works for any LSM? Is linking against libselinux is a viable option if it's not available under all LSM models? Is it available under all LSM models? Perhaps Casey can answer this one.

> > I use to do that, but someone objected... Possibly Karl MacMillan.
>
> Yes, but I think I disagreed then too.

So, who's right?

> It doesn't fit with how other users of security_kernel_act_as() will
> likely want to work (they will want to just set the context to a
> specified value, whether one obtained from the client or from some local
> source), nor with how type transitions normally work (exec, with the
> program type as the second type field). I think it will just cause
> confusion and subtle breakage.

It's causing me lots of confusion as it is. I have been / am being told by different people to do different things just in dealing with SELinux, and various people are raising extra requirements or restrictions beyond that. There doesn't seem to be a consensus.

It sounds like the best option is just to have the kernel nick the userspace daemon's security context and use that as is, and junk all the restrictions on what the daemon can do so that the kernel isn't too restricted.

David

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.