On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 15:20 -0400, Mark Goldman wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 10:45 -0400, Karl MacMillan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 10:04 -0400, Mark Goldman wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2007-05-22 at 17:08 -0400, Karl MacMillan wrote:

<snip>

> > I think the behavior should be similar, but there is no reason that we
> > can't make changes to corner case behavior if we think it would be
> > better. So I don't think an _exact_ port is necessary.
> I didn't know if this particular instance was, in fact, a corner case.
> I'd be just as happy for it to error if it is truly a rare condition.
> Comments?
>

I say make it an error but will defer to others.

> > > > > + list_t *list = NULL;
> > > >
> > > > Why are you adding another list type when we just merged one into
> > > > libsepol? If you want this merged into trunk before policyrep let's move
> > > > the list type over early.
> > > I'm working off of trunk. If it isn't in trunk it I can't use it.
> > >
> >
> > I think another list type is unacceptable so you can either work off
> > policyrep or propose early merging of the list types. Either one is fine
> > with me.
> If you would like to move the list types out of policyrep and into
> trunk, I'll be happy to use it. Otherwise it is out of the scope of
> this patch.
>

Please rebase against the policyrep branch - we can then consider merging the list types and this patch to trunk if desired. I will NACK this patch if it contains the additional list types.

Karl

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.