Security Enhanced Linux
What's New
Frequently Asked Questions
Background
Documents
License
Download
Participating
Mail List
Archives
Remaining Work
Contributors
Related Work
Press Releases
Information Assurance Research
NIARL In-house Research Areas
Mathematical Sciences Program
Sabbaticals
Computer & Information Sciences Research
Technology Transfer
Advanced Computing
Advanced Mathematics
Communications & Networking
Information Processing
Microelectronics
Other Technologies
Technology Fact Sheets
Publications
Related Links
|
SELinux Mailing ListRe: [RFC][PATCH] collect security labels on user processes generating audit messages
From: Stephen Smalley <sds_at_tycho.nsa.gov>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:37:20 -0500
In that case, Tim doesn't need a special check for !ctx in his code at all. But see below.
> It creates parsing problems without a value. If I saw "tty=" and that's all, OTOH, if I see (null), I tend to assume a bug in the code. Isn't it saner to just omit the name=value pair altogether if the value is NULL? Otherwise, you are adding extra processing on the generation and parsing side for no benefit, along with wasting space in the audit message. -- Stephen Smalley National Security Agency -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.Received on Wed 15 Feb 2006 - 11:31:49 EST |
|
Date Posted: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Modified: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Reviewed: Jan 15, 2009 |