Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 22:04 -0500, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote:

>> Please try with the following patch on top:
>>
>> - removes system databases, which are unnecessary, write directly to the 
>> final file
>> - fix 64-bit bugs Joshua's introducing :)

>> I will resync my nodecon patch tomorrow - let me know if anything's 
>> wrong with it, otherwise will submit as is (ordering pending in a later 
>> patch).

IMO we should leave the semanageswig.i as the language neutral interface file (and not remove the _by_idx functions) and make language specific files include it. Then all the common parts are in semanageswig.i and python specific ones are in another file. That way we are free to use better features for python without eliminating the possibility of building the wrappers for another language and it shouldn't make maintenance any harder.

>
> For the nodecon patch, I wasn't sure if we were sufficiently confident
> in the ABI/API stability to include it for FC5 or if it should wait on
> FC6 devel. It would likely help to have feedback from potential users
> of the nodecon API.
>

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.