On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:09, Bill Laut wrote:
> Yes, I had posted to the list that I was working on Security-Enhanced X (or
> "s-ex," as Russell puckishly termed it) some time ago.

Surely I can't have been the first person to notice the SE-X acronym!

At this point I should mention that Security Enhanced X is an important development for Linux, it's something that we've been waiting far too long for, and when it's available I'm sure we won't be able to get enough of it.

We just have to make sure that it's correctly implemented to avoid viruses and unwanted child processes.

-- 
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/   My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/  Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/    Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/  My home page


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.