Research
.
Skip Search Box

SELinux Mailing List

Re: policy booleans

From: Karl MacMillan <kmacmillan_at_tresys.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:23:33 -0500


On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 10:26, Russell Coker wrote:
> Would it be possible for booleans to apply to things other than allow
> statements?
>
> I would like to have booleans determining which domains are allowed in a role,
> and which role transitions are permitted.

[This is an old message - I realized that I never replied]

This would certainly be possible and I think that this would be a useful extension to the conditional policy work, but it wasn't part of our original design spec (especially since role transitions were still deprecated at that point). It is possible that we will find time to do this in the next few months, but I can't commit to anything. I think that Steve was also considering taking this on, but I'll let him reply if he has any specific plans to implement this.

Thanks,

Karl

-- 
Karl MacMillan
Tresys Technology
kmacmillan@tresys.com
http://www.tresys.com
(410) 290-1411 x134


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
Received on Fri 12 Mar 2004 - 16:24:02 EST
 

Date Posted: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Modified: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Reviewed: Jan 15, 2009

 
bottom

National Security Agency / Central Security Service