Security Enhanced Linux
What's New
Frequently Asked Questions
Background
Documents
License
Download
Participating
Mail List
Archives
Remaining Work
Contributors
Related Work
Press Releases
Information Assurance Research
NIARL In-house Research Areas
Mathematical Sciences Program
Sabbaticals
Computer & Information Sciences Research
Technology Transfer
Advanced Computing
Advanced Mathematics
Communications & Networking
Information Processing
Microelectronics
Other Technologies
Technology Fact Sheets
Publications
Related Links
|
SELinux Mailing ListRe: [PATCH 1/4] selinux: add support for querying object classes and permissions from the running policy
From: James Antill <jantill_at_redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:42:07 -0400
So I'm probably just wasting your time out of ignorance here, but this looks really suspicious to me. Why don't you need to add in match->comdatum->permissions.nprim for the allocation? Also how is it guaranteed that one "datum->value - 1" won't be the same in both hashtabs? (if it isn't you've leaked memory). -- James Antill <jantill@redhat.com>Received on Wed 23 May 2007 - 11:42:13 EDT |
|
Date Posted: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Modified: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Reviewed: Jan 15, 2009 |