Research Menu

.
Skip Search Box

SELinux Mailing List

MLS and no read up, no write down

From: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefan_at_sf-net.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 10:06:20 +0200


Hello,

in D. Bell and L. LaPadula "Secure Computer System: Unified Exposition and Multics Interpretation" on page 42 the feature to append something to a file is described as:

if attribute is append, current-level(subject) is dominated by level (object);

Wouldn't this mean that someone with a security level e.g. of unclassified could append something to a file labeled as top secret? Isn't this a security problem? For example someone can't read a top secret file but he could append rubbish or false information.

M. Bishop "Computer Security: Art and Science" describes the Bell LaPadula model on page 125 even for write acces:

S can write O if and only if l(s) <= l(o) and S has discretionary write access to O.

Is the SELinux MLS stuff exactly build like the Bell LaPadule theory? The "no read up" theory sounds good and logical but the "no write down" sounds suspicious. I would expect that if I write to a file that the current level of the subject has to be equal to the level of the object.

How is something like that handled by SELinux?

Best regards,
Stefan

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
Received on Tue 1 May 2007 - 04:06:24 EDT
 

Date Posted: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Modified: Jan 15, 2009 | Last Reviewed: Jan 15, 2009

 
bottom

National Security Agency / Central Security Service