![]() |
![]() |
[Technology 1063] Re: findings on evidence of improvement of literacySilver-Pacuilla, Heidi HSilver-Pacuilla at air.orgThu Jun 14 21:15:44 EDT 2007
Thanks for sharing these timely articles, Marian. The federal study is such a difficult one to argue against since it's main findings - no statistical difference for children's learning gains on standardized tests in classrooms that used supplemental technology - have gotten such wide press. Once you dig in a bit, though, you find out that the study is reporting only a small slice of what they observed. We don't know if teachers who used the software longer than 10 minutes a day or whether teachers who were more experienced integrating technology had higher student outcomes, for example. These key variables would enrich our understanding of the findings as will the second year data, following teachers and classrooms through another year of integration. The first suite of studies you shared from eSchoolNews have been circulating in the ed tech world for quite a while and finally getting some play. Those are all fabulous studies. We need some fabulous studies in adult ed! Heidi ________________________________ From: technology-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:technology-bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of Marian Thacher Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 4:19 PM To: The Technology and Literacy Discussion List Subject: [Technology 1060] Re: findings on evidence of improvement of literacy and languag Hi Heidi, I'm heartened to hear that there is some research validating the use of computer-based or online supplemental materials have a positive effect on learning gains. The headline article in eSchool News today is about ed tech leading to learning gains in 9 states, http://tinyurl.com/36kpcg However, a few weeks ago that federal study was released by the US Dept of Ed showing that instructional software didn't improve learning (for K12, of course), http://tinyurl.com/327rxb. That study leaves a lot of questions unanswered, but it does make me wonder whether the goal should be to show increased learning gains. I know that's considered the gold ring, but maybe, as Tina said, providing technology skills and access as additional learning tools is the goal, as part of literacy in its current form. Marian ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Marian Thacher, OTAN P.O. Box 269003 Sacramento, CA 95826-9003 (916) 228-2597 www.otan.us The Technology and Literacy Discussion List <technology at nifl.gov> on Wednesday, June 13, 2007 at 6:32 AM -0800 wrote: Hello everyone - here is another chunk of my data to share for member checking with you. Does this resonate? Can you share an example that confirms or challenges these findings? **My key question to the group is: What has been your experience with the lowest skilled students? Thanks! Heidi Silver-Pacuilla ++++++++++++ To recap, I am posting preliminary findings (and not my full methodology or bibliography since both are currently incomplete) from the published and posted literature on adult online literacy and language learning. I hope you find them validating or provocative (or both!) and can join in a lively discussion of what's actually happening in your school or program. This is the second of the three main areas I am sharing with the listserv: program implementation issues, evidence of improvements of basic literacy and language skills, and student skills and dispositions associated with successful technology-based and online learning. Here are some key findings from the review of studies reporting evidence of improvement of basic literacy and language skills: There is growing evidence that adult learners' work with computer-based or online materials that are supplemental to adult literacy and ESOL classes contributes positively to their overall literacy and language acquisition plus complementary learning skills. The evaluations reviewed were of supplemental materials available to students with some type of program support (on-site trained teacher or support person, support person available online, tech support available through the program, and/or automated feedback system in the program) and varying degrees of integration with the regular class curriculum. Importantly, the supplemental materials and online interfaces were either uniquely developed or chosen for adult literacy and language learners. Programs have documented successful use of these materials with all levels of students, including those with the lowest levels of literacy and English proficiency. Quantifying specific academic skills achievement is difficult to pinpoint, but several significant studies report learning gains attributable to the supplemental use of technology in instruction and practice. It must be acknowledged that there is still no "body of evidence" with repeated and comparable studies that can definitely answer questions about particular interventions used with particular literacy or language levels with predictable results. How do these findings correlate with your experience and knowledge? ---------------------------------------------------- National Institute for Literacy Technology and Literacy mailing list Technology at nifl.gov To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/technology Email delivered to mthacher at otan.us -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/technology/attachments/20070614/022fd9a6/attachment.html
More information about the Technology mailing list |