				Search Options
Index \| Site Map \| FAQ \| Facility Info \| Reading Rm \| New \| Help \| Glossary \| Contact Us

Integrating Digital and Conventional Human-System Interfaces: Lessons Learned from a Control Room Modernization Program (NUREG/CR-6749)

On this page:

Publication Information
Abstract

Download complete document

The following links on this page are to documents in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). See our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools page for more information. For successful viewing of PDF documents on our site please be sure to use the latest version of Adobe.

NUREG/CR-6749 (PDF - 5.08 MB)

Publication Information

Date Published: September 2002

Prepared by
Emilie Roth, Roth Cognitive Engineering
John O’Hara, Brookhaven National Laboratory

Principid Contractor:
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Energy Sciences and Technology Department
Upton, NY 11973-5000

Subcontractor:
Roth Cognitive Engineering
89 Rawson Road
Brookline, MA 02445-4509
Paul M. Lewis, NRC Project Manager

Prepared for
Divisioin of Systems Analysis and Regulatory Effectiveness
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

Abstract

This study examined the impact of introducing advanced human-system interfaces (HSI) into a conventional nuclear power plant control room. The advanced HSIs include a computer-based procedure system, an advanced alarm system, and a graphic-based plant information display system. The impact of the new systems on the cognitive functioning of individual crew members and on the structure and functioning of the crew as a team was examined. Information on crew performance was obtained by observing crews during full-scope training simulations of plant disturbances. In addition, interviews were conducted with operators and other utility and vendor personnel. The general findings were that the new HSIs provided positive support for crew performance, reduced workload, and were well accepted by the crews. One of the more interesting and significant effects introduced by the advanced HSI systems was on crew structure and communication. The computer-based procedure system enabled the shift supervisor to access plant state information directly, reducing the need to ask board operators for plant parameter values. In turn, the board operators had access to a richer source of plant state information via the advanced alarm system and graphic-based plant information system than previously was available, enabling them to monitor plant state more broadly. These changes have potential implications for human performance and reliability. The fact that crews use multiple independent sources of information and multiple independent perspectives may increase the crew reliability by increasing the probability of detecting and correcting errors in situation assessment, thus reducing the potential for errors of intention. However, the improvement in human performance and reliability depends on the crew’s ability to effectively communicate and maintain a shared situation awareness. The study provides illustrative cases where successful performance is dependent on effective communication among crew members. While this study began exploring these issues, further research is required to establish how new HSIs affect crew structure, communication, decision-making and reliability. The lessons learned from this investigation will be used to support human factors guidance development addressing these topics.