[LearningDisabilities 1541] Re: RTIHayden, Geraldine M. Geraldine.Hayden at vadoc.virginia.govThu Nov 8 12:38:43 EST 2007
I agree with targeting interventions. That should be standard procedure and practice. In the case of working with incarcerated adults, they usually have had a previous identification, so re-evaluations support the need for continued services. The only time I see RTI as a disadvantage is when you have a student that has made little progress in the public school setting who has not been identified and clearly demonstrates they are significantly below expected achievement. You don't have much time with the 18 or 19 year old adult; I would prefer psychoeducational testing to use the discrepancy model. ________________________________ From: learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of robinschwarz1 at aol.com Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 4:01 PM To: learningdisabilities at nifl.gov Subject: [LearningDisabilities 1481] Re: RTI RTI-- or some other more realistic approach--will not replace the discrepancy model as long as we as a culture remain so wedded to the idea that a test or set of tests tells us something meaningful about how a person learns best in a real learning situation. The one major advantage I can see to RTI at this point is that it requires targeted intervention and better teaching before a person can be shuffled off in the referral process, which, in my wide experience as a special needs teacher, director of several tutoring programs and consultant, is often used to move a puzzling student out of a classroom. Robin Lovrien Schwarz, M. Sp. Ed:LD, Independent Consultant in Adult ESOL/ Education and Learning Difficulties -----Original Message----- From: Hayden, Geraldine M. <Geraldine.Hayden at vadoc.virginia.gov> To: The Learning Disabilities Discussion List <learningdisabilities at nifl.gov> Sent: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 2:14 pm Subject: [LearningDisabilities 1477] Re: [Possible SPAM] Re: Transition Questions I can't see that RTI will ever replace the discrepancy model. Geraldine M. Hayden SPED/504 Coordinator Department of Correctional Education Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women ________________________________ From: learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov <mailto:learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov?> ] On Behalf Of Smith, Russell Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 1:25 PM To: The Learning Disabilities Discussion List Subject: [Possible SPAM] [LearningDisabilities 1476] Re: Transition Questions Excellent question! One would hope that some form of standardized would have been performed by the public school to help individualize the IEP. In Missouri, the Department of Corrections is facing the same question. Although we may not start to see any student's who are declared eligible by RTI for many years. Until IQ discrepancy is declared illegal, which may happen during the next reauthorization, we will continue to use it to diagnose student's with SLDs. Russell L. Smith Education Supervisor I Special Education Compliance We have met the enemy and he is us Pogo (Walt Kelly) ________________________________ From: learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov <mailto:learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov?> ] On Behalf Of Michael Tate Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 1:51 PM To: The Learning Disabilities Discussion List Subject: [LearningDisabilities 1459] Re: Transition Questions My state's K-12 education department has decided to implement Responsiveness to Intervention (RTI) at the primary level first, then middle school, and then high school. When we in adult education begin to see students with LD that were served in the RTI model, what kind of transition documents, evidence, plan, testing, etc will they come with? What kind of revision of our adult education disability services eligibility rules and processes might be needed? They are written in the discrepancy model context, so they require students to bring evidence of a diagnosis of LD which is typically based on the discrepancy of IQ and achievement testing, a diagnostic interview, and other life data, and in some cases, goes the next step and suggests classroom and testing accommodations. From: learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov <mailto:learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov?> ] On Behalf Of Will Fagan Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 10:09 AM To: The Learning Disabilities Discussion List Subject: [LearningDisabilities 1456] Re: Transition Questions Is there a common diagnosis for learning disability across the nation? Are common tests used as part of this diagnosis? Or would diagnosis of learning disability depend on the state or region or district in which a person lives? Bill Fagan On 4-Nov-07, at 7:49 PM, PatMFL at aol.com wrote: 1. For the student with a learning disability that is planning on continuing their education at a post-secondary institute, what information should the student know about themselves and what would be the best documentation to provide? 2. What information should be included in a student's summary of performance so that this document would be useful to those who will be providing services in post-secondary settings? 3. What transition assessments provide the most useful information for the student with a learning disability that is planning on continuing their education in a post-secondary institution? 4. What are the skills that need to be learned by a student with a learning disability that is transitioning from a "world on entitlement" to a "world of eligibility"? Patrick Mulvihill, M.Ed Consultant The Transition Center at the University of Florida ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com ---------------------------------------------------- National Institute for Literacy Learning Disabilities mailing list LearningDisabilities at nifl.gov To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/learningdisabilities Email delivered to wfagan at mun.ca ---------------------------------------------------- National Institute for Literacy Learning Disabilities mailing list LearningDisabilities at nifl.gov To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/learningdisabilities Email delivered to robinschwarz1 at aol.com ________________________________ Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail <http://o.aolcdn.com/cdn.webmail.aol.com/mailtour/aol/en-us/index.htm?nc id=AOLAOF00020000000970> ! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/learningdisabilities/attachments/20071108/16e33846/attachment.html
More information about the LearningDisabilities mailing list |