[LearningDisabilities 850] Re: New Dyslexia Theory Blames 'Noise'Andrea Wilder andreawilder at comcast.netWed Jan 10 16:37:12 EST 2007
KC--could you describe your own observations? This would be very useful. Thanks. Andrea On Jan 10, 2007, at 3:57 PM, KC Andrew wrote: > I think it's the first time I've ever seen the suggestion of a > possible medication for a learning disability. It also piqued my > curiosity about the comorbidity of LD, especially in reading, and > AD/HD. The "noise" theory makes intuitive sense in light of my > experiences with students, my conversations with instructors and my > observations of my own AD/HD - LD child and his struggles with > reading. > > KC Andrew > > ________________________________ > > From: learningdisabilities-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of > RKenyon721 at aol.com > Sent: Wed 1/10/2007 12:43 PM > To: learningdisabilities at nifl.gov > Subject: [LearningDisabilities 847] Re: New Dyslexia Theory Blames > 'Noise' > > > Hi KC and Andrea, > > I think this is so interesting and relevant as it came out just > shortly after we had some discussion about research priorities. This > certainly takes a real "hot topic" in the field and narrows it down to > the least common denominators. The results of scholarly research > affect practice. There were some interesting suggestions in the > article that related to how it could affect instruction. Even though > most research is done with children and has to be adapted for our > adult population, it is still noteworthy. > > What do others think? > > Thanks, > > Rochelle > > > Rochelle Kenyon > Moderator, LINCS Learning Disabilities Discussion List > Center for Literacy Studies at the University of Tennessee > RKenyon721 at aol.com > > To post a message: > Learningdisabilities at nifl.gov > > > > > > Rochelle--thanks for the calibre of this! I rely on you to give us the > best, fast, this is worth looking into. > > Thanks! > > Andrea > > > > Hi Rochelle - I thought it was a fascinating premise (I saw is in > Schwab Learning) and it confirmed some of my informal observations of > how dyslexic people approach reading. However, I suspect that there > may be room for both schools of thought (and probably more!) and what > is causal for one dyslexic reader may not be true of all of them. > > KC Andrew > Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges > Adult Basic Education - Professional Development Services > 360/485-2338 > kandrew at sbctc.ctc.edu <mailto:kandrew at sbctc.ctc.edu> > > <winmail.dat>---------------------------------------------------- > National Institute for Literacy > Learning Disabilities mailing list > LearningDisabilities at nifl.gov > To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to > http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/learningdisabilities > Message sent to andreawilder at comcast.net.
More information about the LearningDisabilities mailing list |