[Assessment 1023] Re: GED preparation and creativityshirley ledet msledet at yahoo.comMon Oct 29 13:51:32 EDT 2007
Critical thinking is apply knowledge with speculation. "I think that because the author refers to the drenched grass and the beautiful rainbow" it must have rained." For GED success is can be thought of as a logical conclusion to a given set of information. These skills can be transferred to all 5 subjects. In science if a bird uses it beak to peck at it food, the picture of the one with the pointiest beak should selected. Using the concept of money and food to do and understand word problems. Teaching critical thinking helps our students understand that they know more then they think they know. This in turn inspires them to stay, dream and want to succeed. Finally a place that believes in the their ability to learn and not expect that they already know and should just study harder. Shirley-NHC-Carver Houston, Texas Katherine G <Kgotthardt at comcast.net> wrote: I don't think we can distinguish creativity from critical thinking. They overlap and feed one another. The more you ask students to be creative, the more critical thinking they practice. After all, how can one begin to do something like write a poem or story, create a picture, sing a song, make meaning of what they see and hear without critical thinking? Likewise, unless we express our critical thinking, what good is it? Rote memorization yields neither critical thinking nor creativity. Creativity, to me, means expressing our thoughts in meaningful ways, expressing our ideas in ways that others might not expect but that a variety of people with different learning styles and perspectives can appreciate, melding those ideas so they come out in a form we design. But this kind of thinking takes time and a willingness to consider ideas. Rigid, controlling individuals rarely appreciate creativity. Anyone care to help me qualify that statement? : ) Katherine Mercurio Gotthardt -----Original Message----- From: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:assessment-bounces at nifl.gov]On Behalf Of David J. Rosen Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 11:18 PM To: The Assessment Discussion List Subject: [Assessment 1015] GED preparation and creativity Hello Andrea, On Oct 27, 2007, you wrote: > Has anybody yet in this conversation defined 1. critical reading > and 2. creativity? Here's more on defining creativity. To begin with, it's quite unlikely that we will agree on a definition. There are more than 60 of them in the psychological literature (Taylor, 1988), and as far as I am aware there is no standardized measurement instrument for creativity. Some believe it is inherited; some believe it can be taught; some believe it can be nurtured or encouraged. I believe that some kinds of creativity can be taught or at least nurtured and that it involves a set of mental activities often closely aligned with the kind of mental activities we call critical thinking. Most of us would agree, I believe, that a key element is originality, but we might differ in describing the paths to it. And it may look different in different contexts, in the sciences, in the arts, in technology, and in the creative problem solving of daily living. In the context in which I raised the issue of creativity, I was thinking of the application of new ideas, what some would refer to as innovation or ingenuity. It is this applied creativity that I believe Marc Tucker had in mind as something that Americans have historically valued and excelled at, that has been an element of American economic success, and that may be undervalued or lost now in the education systems' rush toward performance on high stakes standardized tests. Are adult literacy education students (including basic education, secondary education and ESOL) capable of this kind of creativity? If so, should we nurture it? I believe they are and that we should. In many GED programs I have seen, it is not nourished, usually not even acknowledged in program goals or objectives. And I have never seen it measured. This indicates to me that, as a field, we do not value and support student creativity. I agree with Marc Tucker that, if we are interested in Americans' global competitiveness that we should value creativity, and of course, there are other good reasons to nourish creativity. What do you think about this? * Taylor, C.W. (1988). "Various approaches to and definitions of creativity", in ed. Sternberg, R.J.: The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives. Cambridge University Press. David J. Rosen djrosen at comcast.net ------------------------------- National Institute for Literacy Assessment mailing list Assessment at nifl.gov To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment Email delivered to kgotthardt at comcast.net ------------------------------- National Institute for Literacy Assessment mailing list Assessment at nifl.gov To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment Email delivered to msledet at yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/assessment/attachments/20071029/1f46a517/attachment.html
More information about the Assessment mailing list |