[ProfessionalDevelopment 2275] On dialogue and critical thinkingTaylor, Jackie jataylor at utk.eduSun Jul 13 19:29:42 EDT 2008
Hi Steve, (All) You wrote: "Unfortunately, the recent trend in educational circles seems to favour "dialoguing", whereby we pretend to agree with whatever is said, and look for points that we have in common, and should avoid trying to persuade anyone of one's point of view. This leads to a sterile discussion. It only works if everyone actually does agree, or if contrary views can be suppressed.." I disagree with how you are characterizing dialogue. Do you mean to equate dialogue with some type of cooperation or consensus, or group think..? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink) I believe dialogue is about presenting one's point of view, but then looking for meaning, suspending assumptions (i.e. suspend as in to hold out assumptions and examine them), being open to changing one's position... Dialogue and the knowledge constructed as a result are greater than the sum of its parts and what is constructed is only as rich as the diverse perspectives brought to the table. It depends on seeking authentic meaning and a 'safe space' so that individuals feel comfortable expressing their views (thus eliciting more diverse perspectives). It does include finding common ground, but I see it as being more about constructing new knowledge, attitudes, and the group dynamics needed for that construction. And what does this have to do with critical thinking and student involvement? One uses critical thinking in dialogue. What does "the other" mean by what she said? How is what I'm saying reflected in the other's position? How is it not? How might I understand the other better? What are the "right questions" I need to ask in order to do that? All too often I think we are afraid to "ask back" for fear of appearing somehow "less than" or as if one might "not know" what the other means. It also levels the playing field and the instructor or facilitator is not perceived as "the expert" with all the answers; both students and instructors have expertise to contribute. It would be interesting, I think, to explore strategies for facilitating dialogue vs. debate. As always, I welcome others' thoughts. Best, Jackie Jackie Taylor jataylor at utk.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/professionaldevelopment/attachments/20080713/52aed9a1/attachment.html
More information about the ProfessionalDevelopment mailing list |