![]() |
![]() |
[ProfessionalDevelopment 2395] Re: Critical Thinking-Student InvolvementSteve Kaufmann steve at thelinguist.comMon Jul 21 15:18:44 EDT 2008
David, Janet and others, I have not experienced any difference between learning a language as a second language, or as a foreign language. I have seen people live where the language is spoken and not learn, and I have seen people learn very well in places where the language is not spoken. My experience with immigrant ESL practitioners in Canada has been a very strong resistance to teaching outside the classroom, and a resistance to anyone, such as LingQ, not in the "public sector", getting involved in language instruction. I run a lumber and software business. Six years ago, while learning Cantonese on my own, I heard on local Cantonese radio about a Chinese immigrant to Canada who had all his money stolen at the airport. I hired him, basically to help him out. He had high TOEFL scores but could really not communicate in English. I discovered that there were many like him, educated professionals with poor communication skills in English, and no time to go to class. That was why I started developing and online language learning system, six years ago. I have been met with indifference or resistance by the teaching establishment. I was told on more than one occasion that language learning can only take place in a classroom. I was told by one government source that they would only fund e-learning if the learner could prove that they could not come to class. I guess the concern is that the e-learner cannot be relied on to study on his or her own. On the other hand I regularly hear from adult ESL teachers that if attendance at class is not compulsory, people stop coming, and when it is compulsory learners often ask the teacher to say that they came, when the did not. If a person is not committed to learning, a class will not help. Human nature is human nature, and immigrants are no exception. Of course learning will happen faster if there is an opportunity for face to face contact, or some kind of direct encouragement and pressure from a friendly teacher. We have a higher attrition rate amongst the majority of learners who use LingQ free, compared to those who pay to interact with a tutor. E-learning is not competition for the classroom, but a means of extending the influence of the teacher, of leveraging classroom time. It is obviously convenient for the learner, and less expensive to incorporate some structured self-learning, the degree and nature of that independent learning to depend on the situation of the learner. However, the reaction of teachers here was one of professional protectionism and annoyance that someone without any academic background in their field, was invading their turf. As for proof of what works, David, I can point to testimonials of our students. One, an immigrant engineer from Venezuela, spent 14 months at an ESL school and was totally frustrated. After 4 months with our approach he regained his confidence, improved his language skills, went on to attend a Community College to upgrade his engineering skills, outperformed many native speaking Canadians in his communication class and is now happily employed. You can find my view of the recent CAL study <goog_1216665349833> <http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=dhr5gc97_43ftt5bvfd&hl=en>on the impact of instructional hours on language improvement amongst immigrants. The poor results from classroom language instruction in Canada is well documented. In one case less than 1% of students in New Brunswick could achieve even an intermediate level of oral proficiency after 12 years of daily French instruction. Most people who learn to speak another language well, do it largely on their own. Somehow language classes should have as a major part of their goal, to transform their learners into more independent, and therefore more successful independent learners. If political activism helps to achieve that goal, then it is a good thing. But the goal of a language class should be language improvement. Steve -- Steve Kaufmann www.lingq.com 1-604-922-8514 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/professionaldevelopment/attachments/20080721/aff5652c/attachment.html
More information about the ProfessionalDevelopment mailing list |