CASAS is currently completing development of a new Life and Work Listening Series in which there are no written distractors for students to read during the test, only aural prompts and distractors at the Intermediate and Advanced levels. Everything is repeated to minimize the demand on short term memory. We believe this will provide a more accurate measure of students' listening ability, as distinct from their reading ability. If any programs would like to participate in field testing this new series, please let me know. 
 
Also, some programs use the CASAS Functional Writing Assessment Picture Task for NRS reporting for students at higher levels since writing is an area in which they often still need instruction.  
 
Linda Taylor, Director of Assessment Development, CASAS
ltaylor at casas.org
(800) 255-1036, ext. 186

________________________________

From: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov on behalf of JO PAMMENT
Sent: Thu 10/26/2006 9:13 AM
To: The Assessment Discussion List
Subject: [Assessment 546] Re: Measuring Outside the NRS



Currently we can choose either TABE or CASAS for our program.  Most of us use CASAS for ESL and TABE for ABE.  However we are looking at how to meet the needs of the students who can test out of CASAS because they can read well, but still can't speak or understand well.  I've tried the CASAS listening test for the higher level testing population, but it works more as a reading test so doesn't help us much.
Jo Pamment
Michigan

Jo Pamment
Director Adult Ed. ESL
Haslett Public Schools
1118 S. Harrison
East Lansing, Michigan 48823

TEL:  517 337-8353
FAX:  517 337-3195
E-Mail:  pammenjk at haslett.k12.mi.us


>>> "Virginia Tardaewether" <tarv at chemeketa.edu> 10/25/06 3:20:57 PM >>>

Wow
TABE And CASAS, that seems like unnecessary testing to me.  Keeping up with one is plenty enough I hope we never go to more.
va

-----Original Message-----
From: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:assessment-bounces at nifl.gov] On Behalf Of JO PAMMENT
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 6:57 AM
To: assessment at nifl.gov
Subject: [Assessment 543] Re: Measuring Outside the NRS

Hello Marie,
I have been following the assessment discussion.  In Michigan we are mandated to use CASAS and TABE 9 and 10.  And we must test every 90 hours of student attendance.  These tests have not met all of our needs however.  I am interested in learning about the TABE ESL test that is coming out.  Has it been approved by the Federal government yet?  Has anyone seen or tried it yet?
Jo Pamment

Jo Pamment
Director Adult Ed. ESL
Haslett Public Schools
1118 S. Harrison
East Lansing, Michigan 48823

TEL:  517 337-8353
FAX:  517 337-3195
E-Mail:  pammenjk at haslett.k12.mi.us

>>> "Marie Cora" <marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com> 10/24/06 3:30 PM >>>

Dear Grace and Nancy -

(First a big thank you to everyone who has jumped in - I knew that this
was important to you all.  As your busy time permits, keep on posting!)

Thanks so much for your perspectives.  I'm sure that you are not the
only ones whose programs conduct assessment outside of the NRS
requirements.  You both have hit on a number of extremely important
issues.  If you do not receive federal dollars, then you do not have to
adhere to NRS requirements - what types of assessments and tools do you
use if this is your case?  What sort of schedule or structure do you use
for intake, pre-assessment, on-going assessment, post-assessment?  Who
does the assessing?  Do you gauge non-academic skills?  If so, how?  Do
you set up benchmarks such as gaining grade levels or is this not a part
of the program?  How about timeframes?  Is that not as important because
you are not bound by the federal system?

Nancy - you said:  "I sense that by your colleagues' standards my
program would be deemed ineffective."  I have many questions:  who is to
say what is effective if your students stay and keep learning, and
improve their skills?  How about Nancy's question Subscribers:  is this
true?  Do you feel that Grace and Nancy's programs are less effective
because of their focus and structure?  Or do you feel a bit envious that
their programs are not bound by the strict requirements of NRS-tied
funding?  If your program receives federal dollars, do you feel that you
can really truly focus on the student's goal, or do you feel like you
need to figure their goal out for them (with the best of intentions) in
order to make sure you can show learning gains across your program and
keep your funding?  Katrina lamented about this in her post I think.  Do
you feel that helping the student work on her goal and following the
federal requirements are at odds or can they work together?

Let's hear from others on the List who are in a similar position to
Grace and Nancy.  If you are not tied to using the tools, structures,
and timeframes required by federal funding, then what does your program
look like - and how do you feel about that?  And for those folks who do
receive federal funding, what are your thoughts and questions for folks
whose programs work outside of the NRS requirements?

Thanks!

Marie Cora
Assessment Discussion List Moderator



-----Original Message-----
From: assessment-bounces at nifl.gov [mailto:assessment-bounces at nifl.gov]
On Behalf Of Grace Temple
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1:56 PM
To: assessment at nifl.gov
Subject: [Assessment 537] Re: peep?

A great big AMEN! goes out to Nancy. This echos my position exactly.  I
too, am a director of our county Literacy Council.  I read all the posts
but respond to only a few as most don't seem to connect to our program.
All post assessment is done by the tutors (volunteers) who have been
trained to use the SLOSSON  lists.  This only gives us a ballpark figure
but it is the student's satisfaction that counts the most.  Do they feel
they have gained?  If they feel better about their ability to learn,
think they can handle everyday reading better and are willing to
continue, then our tutors have done well.

Grace Temple
Executive Director
Sanilac Literacy Council
Sanilac County, MI

  _____ 

From:  Nancy Hansen <sfallsliteracy at ist
<assessment at nifl.gov>
To:  The Assessment Discussion List <assessment at nifl.gov>
Subject:  [Assessment 533] Re: peep?
Date:  Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:56:32 -0700 (PDT)

Marie -
  

  
Without a peep .... I have been lurking ... every once in a while but
not regularly on this thread.  Part of the reason I haven't replied is
the emails that were posted were so loooong.  I felt it would require
research to read thoroughly and respond, so I didn't.  And I'm as always
busy with many projects as the only full-time paid staff.
  

  
It's not that I am not interested personally, but via my scanning the
posts I feel The Movement is not taking into consideration one (of a
couple) very important factors:  Some adult learners cannot commit to
the kind of time that many of you speak about.  That means their time
with their study is also very precious even though elongated.  If
testing takes away that time, it would be resented.
  

  
Ours is an adult literacy program driven by volunteer instructors.  The
focus
of the materials includes periodic check-ups built into the lessons.
(Note:  Not called Tests.)  However, I sense that by your colleagues'
standards my program would be deemed ineffective.  You know .... the
learners aren't gaining a grade level every year.  Quite frankly the
learners don't *care* about that form of measurement. 
  

  
So I lurk.  I feel, No. 2, The System places too *little* importance on
what it is that the adult learner has brought with them as goals in
their need to read, write and spell better.  It cannot be measured in
many cases ... except, perhaps, in smiles, self-confidence and improved
worth.  *That* our learners *do* treasure!  How do members of the adult
education system intend those skill development factors to be measured?
Learner Portfolios are part of *our* system, yet unacceptable to the
NRS.
It used to be that the check-up scores counted.  But no longer.
  

  
Until the answers are clear, this agency director will remain on the
perimeters of the assessment discussion ... and *consequently* the
agency will continue without funding that is tied to a grade level
increase requirement.  The kicker is: The learners *like* what they are
receiving and that matters more.  At least to me.
  

  
Nancy Hansen
  
Executive Director
  
Sioux Falls Area Literacy Council
  
Sioux Falls, SD

Marie Cora <marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com> wrote:
  
        
    
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;font-family:'Times
New Roman';}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;text-underline:single;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;text-underline:single;}
span.EmailStyle17
{font-family:Arial;color:windowtext;}
span.SpellE
{;}
span.GramE
{;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
    
  
Dear colleagues,
  

  
Are you out there?  Is this a bad time for a discussion?  Is the topic
not of interest?
  

  
Aside from Virginia's post last week, I haven't heard from any of the
550 subscribers to the List.  I'm assuming that the topic (Measuring
Education Gains in Adult Literacy, 10/17 and
10/18) is of interest.  But you need to let me know if it is or not.  I
generally gauge interest based on Subscriber responses, so if this is an
indication, the topic is not hot (which surprises me). 
  

  
Are there other topics you'd prefer to engage in?  What are they?  The
purpose of this List is to provide a forum for discussion that goes well
beyond your program's walls, so if I'm not hitting on the right stuff, I
really do need to hear from you. 
Membership here continues to climb, but you are all very silent.  
  

  
I really want to hear your thoughts and I want to know how this List can
serve you well.  Please let me know. hts to the List or to
me personally regarding other discussions that you would like to see
happen - and I'll make them happen. 
  

  
I value and appreciate your membership highly - but a Discussion List is
only as good as the discussions that occur.  If you've never posted and
that makes you a bit reticent, feel free to send me your post and I can
do a couple of things like help you compose your message, or I can post
your message for you anonymously.  The important thing is for your
voices to be heard.
  

  
Thanks!
  

  
marie
  

  
Marie Cora
  
 <mailto:marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com> marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com
  
NIFL Assessment Discussion List Moderator
  
http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
  
Coordinator, LINCS Assessment Special Collection
  
http://literacy.kent.edu/Midwest/assessment/
  

  

-------------------------------
National Institute for Literacy
Assessment mailing list
Assessment at nifl.gov
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment

  _____ 

Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman1/*http:/us.rd.yahoo.com 
/evt=39663/*http:/voice.yahoo.com>  PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+
countries) for 2¢/min or less.


>-------------------------------

>National Institute for Literacy

>Assessment mailing list

>Assessment at nifl.gov

>To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to

http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment

-------------------------------
National Institute for Literacy
Assessment mailing list
Assessment at nifl.gov
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
-------------------------------
National Institute for Literacy
Assessment mailing list
Assessment at nifl.gov
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
-------------------------------
National Institute for Literacy
Assessment mailing list
Assessment at nifl.gov
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 14105 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.nifl.gov/pipermail/assessment/attachments/20061026/c7a74565/attachment.bin