![]() |
![]() |
[Assessment 258] Re: FW from Content StandardsKatrina Hinson khinson at future-gate.comMon Mar 20 11:28:29 EST 2006
Not everyone uses EFF. What about them? How do you go about addressing the questions/concerns such people might have as to why they don't use a system if it's already in place? Regards Katrina >>> marie.cora at hotspurpartners.com >>> Dear Colleagues, The following post is in response to comments made by David Rosen on the Assessment Discussion List on Sunday, March 19 regarding standards and on-line performance assessment. Thanks, marie ---- all A bottom-up, field (practitioner and learner) - represented set of standards? Sounds like EFF, no? What am I missing here? We have this rich, useful resource in EFF. Are we talking about starting over? Something different? Don't we have this already? Aren't some of us building on it? Janet Isserlis >> >> Some might think that what I propose is too top-down. I would argue >> that it could be very bottom-up if the field -- and adult learner >> leaders -- are/have been/will be well-represented in setting the >> standards, and if the modules can be be selected to meet specific >> learner goals and contexts as well as to the standards. David Rosen ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------- National Institute for Literacy Assessment mailing list Assessment at nifl.gov To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/assessment
More information about the Assessment mailing list |