Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in Oklahoma
(FY 2003)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2003
Total dollars: $1,984,428,682
The amount for this search is 0.7% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This state is ranked 33 among states for this year.
Total number of contractors: 950
Total number of transactions: 9,219
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$842,103,023
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$304,327,905
Competition within a limited pool$264,975,555
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$74,425,751
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$292,173,029
Not competed for an allowable reason$205,226,945
Not identified, soon to be addressed$1,196,474

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$15,240,849
Delaware At Large (Michael N. Castle)$5,265,224
Alaska At Large (Don Young)$4,818,415
South Dakota At Large (John R. Thune / William J. Janklow)$2,174,806
Oklahoma 4 (J. C. Watts Jr. / Tom Cole)$1,998,186

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Aircraft and Airframe Structural Components$147,602,348
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Aircraft Components and Accessories$121,021,126
Construction of Structures and Facilities -- Penal Facilities$107,426,245
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Ground Effect Vehicles, Motor Vehicles, Trailers, and Cycles$83,332,075
Aircraft, Fixed Wing$76,697,411

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$828,801,594
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$418,790,950
NAVY, Department of the$140,803,683
Bureau of Prisoners/Federal Prison System$117,569,604
ENERGY, Department of$56,313,945

Top 10 Contractors

The Boeing Company$305,698,348
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc.$290,096,345
URS Corporation$140,635,000
Flint Resources Company LLC$115,270,823
Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma$56,935,293
Chickasaw Nation$55,059,754
Infrasource Transmission Services Company$53,691,138
Wyandotte Tribal Petroleum, Inc$40,143,870
The Ross Group Construction Corporation$33,331,051
Tiger Natural Gas, Inc.$32,526,832

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$1,379,871,855
2001$1,455,623,333
2002$1,546,441,972
2003$1,984,428,682
2004$2,491,570,676
2005$2,527,865,751
2006$2,649,548,368
2007$2,544,331,307
2008$2,029,770,821
2009 1Q * Partial year help link$5,372,348
*Note: FY 2009 only includes data for the first quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 17, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.