Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Fast-Track vs Conventional for UKA
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00284635   Information provided by Frederiksberg University Hospital
First Received: January 31, 2006   Last Updated: July 3, 2007   History of Changes
This Tabular View shows the required WHO registration data elements as marked by

January 31, 2006
July 3, 2007
 
 
 
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00284635 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Fast-Track vs Conventional for UKA
 

The purpose of this study is to see if it is possible to discharge patient undergoing a UKA 1 day postoperatively

 
Phase IV
Interventional
Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
Procedure: Fast track vs conventional
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Completed
 
 
 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • UKA, ASA I-II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • medical history of abdominal bleeding
Both
18 Years and older
No
 
Denmark
 
 
NCT00284635
 
 
Frederiksberg University Hospital
 
Principal Investigator: arne borgwardt, M.D. Frederiksberg University Hospital
Frederiksberg University Hospital
July 2007

 †    Required WHO trial registration data element.
††   WHO trial registration data element that is required only if it exists.