Remarks by MCC CEO Ambassador John Danilovich at the Post-Board Public Outreach Meeting

December 13, 2007

Welcome

Review of MCC Progress since September

First, REORGANIZATION

to meet that future and better achieve our mission, without compromising our ongoing commitment

Second, a FULL BOARD

Third, COMPACTS/THRESHOLD PROGRAMS

Fourth, our DEMOCRACY PAPER

Fifth, ENGAGEMENT

We have had a very exciting and busy fall…

Outcome of Board Meeting

…capped by our Board’s decisions yesterday on the selection of new compact-eligible and threshold-eligible countries. 

I am pleased to announce that

Let me say a few words about some other countries that were considered, but not selected eligible for funding.

When our panel convenes, Sherri Kraham will go into more detail on the countries selected and considered, but I wish to highlight three key points about our selection process.

First, MCC’s selection process will continue to be based on the rigorous evaluation of a country’s performance on our eligibility indicators, including a commitment to democratic governance.  Providing aid through an objective, indicator-based selection process that measures sound policy performance remains MCC’s defining hallmark.

This applies not only to newly selected countries but also to our current compact countries, which must maintain and improve performance.

Maintaining good policy performance supports our reorganization efforts to fully and successfully implement our current compacts and achieve sustainable results among the countries with which we are now working. 

Similarly, we are better defining the factors we take into account to determine which countries are eligible for MCC’s threshold program, including

Second, MCC’s selection process has become more competitive. Our selection process is a competition, and this year’s selection process has reached a heightened and increased level of competition based on higher standards for eligibility.  This is due to a number of factors:

Third, MCC holds our compact partners accountable for maintaining and improving performance. Should a compact country not meet the eligibility criteria, MCC evaluates its policy performance to determine whether there has been a significant policy reversal.

We distinguish between countries that have a significant policy reversal or a pattern of actions inconsistent with MCC’s eligibility criteria, and those countries that do not meet the criteria due to technical reasons or slight changes in performance. 
If a country does not meet the criteria—but is generally maintaining performance—we are willing to allow our current partner countries some time to address the indicator issues. 

However, we believe that there should be consequences for failing performance and significant policy reversals and remain willing to suspend a country for a significant policy reversal.

Again, Sherri, will go into more details about MCC’s selection process when the panel convenes.

Conclusion

Country Tools | Privacy Policy | Plug Ins | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OIG Hotline | Subscribe to Outreach List (Unsubscribe)