Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives Free Trail Issue
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 113, Number 10, October 2005 Open Access
spacer
Lessons Learned for the Assessment of Children’s Pesticide Exposure: Critical Sampling and Analytical Issues for Future Studies

Richard A. Fenske,1 Asa Bradman,2 Robin M. Whyatt,3 Mary S. Wolff,4 and Dana B. Barr5

1Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; 2Center for Children’s Environmental Health Research, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA; 3Columbia Center for Children’s Environmental Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA; 4Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; 5National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Abstract
In this article we examine sampling strategies and analytical methods used in a series of recent studies of children’s exposure to pesticides that may prove useful in the design and implementation of the National Children’s Study. We focus primarily on the experiences of four of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/ Children’s Centers and include University of Washington studies that predated these centers. These studies have measured maternal exposures, perinatal exposures, infant and toddler exposures, and exposure among young children through biologic monitoring, personal sampling, and environmental monitoring. Biologic monitoring appears to be the best available method for assessment of children’s exposure to pesticides, with some limitations. It is likely that a combination of biomarkers, environmental measurements, and questionnaires will be needed after careful consideration of the specific hypotheses posed by investigators and the limitations of each exposure metric. The value of environmental measurements, such as surface and toy wipes and indoor air or house dust samples, deserves further investigation. Emphasis on personal rather than environmental sampling in conjunction with urine or blood sampling is likely to be most effective at classifying exposure. For infants and young children, ease of urine collection (possible for extended periods of time) may make these samples the best available approach to capturing exposure variability of nonpersistent pesticides ; additional validation studies are needed. Saliva measurements of pesticides, if feasible, would overcome the limitations of urinary metabolite-based exposure analysis. Global positioning system technology appears promising in the delineation of children’s time-location patterns. Key words: , , , , . Environ Health Perspect 113: 1455-1462 (2005) . doi:10.1289/ehp.7674 available via http://dx.doi.org/ [Online 24 June 2005]


This article is part of the mini-monograph “Lessons Learned from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Centers for Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research for the National Children’s Study.”

Address correspondence to R. Fenske, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, Box 357234, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA. Telephone: (206) 543-0916. Fax: (206) 616-2687. E-mail: rfenske@u.washington.edu

The National Children’s Study provided support for the preparation of the manuscript. The Children’s Center studies were supported by grants ES009605, ES009601, ES009584, and ES009600 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Science and R826709, R826886, R827039, and R827027 from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . University of Washington Pacific Northwest Agricultural Safety and Health Center studies were supported by grants R819186, 916001537, and R82517101 from the U.S. EPA and S147-14/16 and U07/CCU012926 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (Association of Schools of Public Health and Agricultural Centers Program) .

The authors declare they have no competing financial interests.

Received 12 October 2004 ; accepted 24 May 2005.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML or PDF formats.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov