Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives Free Trail Issue
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 108, Number 9, September 2000 Open Access
spacer
An Assessment of Air Toxics in Minnesota

Gregory C. Pratt, Kari Palmer, Chun Yi Wu, Fardin Oliaei, Cynthia Hollerbach, and Mary Jean Fenske

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Environmental Outcomes Division, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA

Abstract

We used monitoring and modeling to assess the concentrations of air toxics in the state of Minnesota. Model-predicted concentrations for 148 hazardous air pollutants were from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cumulative Exposure Project (1990 data) . Monitoring data consisted of samples of volatile organic compounds, carbonyls, and particulate matter less than/equal to 10 µm in aerodynamic diameter collected at 25 sites throughout the state for varying periods of time (up to 8 years ; 1991-1998) . Ten pollutants exceeded health benchmark values at one or more sites by modeling, monitoring, or both (including acrolein, arsenic, benzene, 1,3-butadiene, carbon tetrachloride, chromium, chloroform, ethylene dibromide, formaldehyde, and nickel) . Polycyclic organic matter also exceeded the benzo[a]pyrene health benchmark value assumed to represent this class of pollutants. The highest modeled and monitored concentrations of most pollutants were near the center of the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area ; however, many smaller cities throughout the state also had elevated concentrations. Where direct comparisons were possible, monitored values often tended to exceed model estimates. Upper-bound excess lifetime inhalation cancer risks were estimated to range from 2.7 Times 10-5 to 140.9 Times 10-5 (modeling) and 4.7 Times 10-5 to 11.0 Times 10-5 (using a smaller set of monitored carcinogens) . Screening noncancer hazard indices summed over all end points ranged from 0.2 to 58.1 (modeling) and 0.6 to 2.0 (with a smaller set of monitored pollutants) . For common sets of pollutants, the concentrations, cancer risks, and noncancer hazard indices were comparable between model-based estimates and monitored values. The inhalation cancer risk was apportioned to mobile sources (54%) , area sources (22%) , point sources (12%) , and background (12%) . This study provides evidence that air toxics are a public health concern in Minnesota. Key words: , , , , , , . Environ Health Perspect 108:815-825 (2000) . [Online 24 July 2000]

http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/2000/108p815-825pratt/ abstract.html

Address correspondence to G.C. Pratt, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Environmental Outcomes Division, 520 Lafayette Rd, St. Paul, MN 55155 USA. Telephone: (651) 296-7664. Fax: (651) 297-7709. E-mail: gregory.pratt@pca.state.mn.us

We thank the air quality monitoring staff of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, including but not limited to D. Bock, M. Conley, P. Cornette, R. Eckart, D. Fenlon, D. Fundine, D. Meerdink, R. Monson, B. Nguyen, G. Rohweder, M. Schifsky, and R. Strassman.

Received 1 February 2000 ; accepted 26 April 2000.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML or PDF formats.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov