Home > Forecasts & Analysis > International Energy Outlook 2008 > Defining the Limits of Oil Production

International Energy Outlook 2008
 

Mid-Term Prospects for Nuclear Electricity Generation in China, India, and the United States 

Around the world, nuclear power plants are getting renewed attention and consideration as an option for electricity generation to meet rising demand in the future. For many years, analysts expected nuclear power to grow slowly in the short term and decline in the long term. More recently, however, many countries have begun looking anew at nuclear power to displace generation from fossil fuels, in response to both sustained high prices for oil and natural gas and the desire to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. In addition, concerns about energy security among those nations that rely heavily on fossil fuel imports have made nuclear power an attractive option for electricity production. 

Still, there are barriers to the nuclear power option, including public concerns about plant safety, disposal of radioactive waste, and nuclear weapons proliferation—not to mention the relatively high capital and maintenance costs of nuclear plants. Even if safety, health, and political concerns were answered sufficiently to allow new nuclear plants to be built, the escalating expense of building them (particularly, in comparison with capital costs for other plant types) could prevent them from being constructed. The costs of commodities such as iron, steel, cement, and concrete, as well as the capital costs of energy equipment and facilities, all have increased substantially in the past few years; and because nuclear plants tend to be more capital intensive than fossil fuel generators, these cost increases tended to make nuclear power less competitive despite the recent surge in fossil fuel prices. 

In at least three countries—China, India, and the United States—nuclear power currently is positioned for strong growth (see figure opposite): 

  • Although China has the youngest nuclear power program of the three nations (its first nuclear power plant began operating in 1991), it is expected to add a net 45 gigawatts of nuclear capacity by 2030. In the IEO2008 reference case, China’s nuclear electricity generation increases from 50 billion kilowatthours in 2005 to 410 billion kilowatthours in 2030, an average annual growth rate of 8.8 percent. 
  • India is projected to add 17 gigawatts of new nuclear capacity and increase production by 9.4 percent annually. Although India has not signed the international Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), it is expected to forge an agreement with the United States and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that will allow it to import sufficient fuel and reactor parts to achieve the projected increase. 
  • The United States is projected to add 16.6 gigawatts of new nuclear capacity and 2.7 gigawatts of capacity in the form of uprates to existing plants. Those increases are partially offset, however, by the anticipated retirement of several older reactors. 

China 

China is trying to diversify its sources of electricity, and increasing nuclear power capacity is seen as a strategy to achieve that goal. Unlike most of the OECD nations, China will be able to expand its nuclear program largely without political deterrents. 

At present, China has 11 commercial nuclear power reactors in operation, 6 of which have been brought on line since 2002. Another 6 plants are currently under construction, and several more are in various stages of planning.a The Chinese government is also in the process of awarding billions of dollars in contracts to build additional nuclear plants. France’s AREVA, Russia’s AtomStroyExport, and U.S.-based Westinghouse all have won bids. In the world’s largest nuclear power deal to date, China will pay $11.9 billion to AREVA to build two nuclear reactors. 

China hopes to construct 30 new reactors by 2020, increasing its nuclear portfolio from 2.3 percent of the country’s total electricity generation in 2008 to 6 percent in 2020. By 2050, it aims to have at least 150 gigawatts of installed nuclear capacity, providing 22 percent of the country’s projected generation mix.b In the IEO2008 reference case, China’s installed nuclear capacity reaches 35 gigawatts in 2020, 45 gigawatts in 2025, and 52 gigawatts in 2030, which would supply 5 percent of its total electricity generation in 2030. 

India 

India’s first nuclear power plant became operational in 1969. Since that time, however, the growth in operating nuclear capacity has been slow and, at best, uneven. In 2005 nuclear power accounted for just 2.4 percent of India’s electricity generation, and its operating nuclear capacity totaled only 2.8 gigawatts. Because India has refused to sign the NPT, it has been barred from importing nuclear reactors and fuel from the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG). 

In response to rapid growth in electricity demand, India is intent on increasing its generation from nuclear power. The country’s Department of Atomic Energy has a goal of increasing nuclear capacity to 20 gigawatts by 2020, more than seven times the current installed nuclear capacity.c 

To support such an expansion of its nuclear program, India began talks with the United States in July 2005, in an effort to build favorable conditions that will allow it to purchase nuclear reactor parts and fuel. On the part of the United States, negotiations are aimed at persuading India to agree to some nonproliferation measures that would enable it to import nuclear materials without becoming a full signatory to the NPT. The negotiations are suspended at present because of dissent among members of some of India’s political parties, who do not trust the political, economic, and military relationships being developed as part of the strategic partnership between India and the United States. The talks are expected to resume in the near future.d 

The NSG is awaiting the conclusion of the U.S.-India negotiations, as well as a safeguards agreement between India and the IAEA, before deciding whether to grant India an exception to nuclear import restrictions. Several countries, including France, Russia and Australia, are already discussing nuclear cooperation and contract deals with India in the event that an exception to the NSG guidelines is extended to India. 

In the IEO2008 reference case, India’s nuclear power capacity grows rapidly, by an average of 8.2 percent per year, to 14 gigawatts in 2020 and 20 gigawatts in 2030. The projection still falls short, however, of the Indian Prime Minister’s goal of achieving 20 gigawatts of operating nuclear generation capacity by 2020. 

United States 

The United States has the world’s oldest commercial nuclear power program. The first electric power generation from nuclear energy occurred on December 20, 1951, in Arco, Idaho; and the world’s first large-scale nuclear power plant, a 60-megawatt pressurized-water reactor, began operation on December 2, 1957, in Shippingport, Pennsylvania. The U.S. program expanded quickly in the 1960s and 1970s. Nuclear generation supplied 2.4 percent of U.S. electricity in 1971, 11 percent in 1979, and 20 percent at its height in 1992, when 111 U.S. nuclear generators were in operation. Today, 103 nuclear power plants supply nearly 800 billion kilowatthours of electricity in the United States— just under 20 percent of total U.S. generation. 

In the mid- to late 1970s, U.S. public opinion started to turn against nuclear power. The rapidly escalating costs of building nuclear plants, including the costs of added safety measures, throughout the 1970s and 1980s contributed to large increases in electricity prices. Aside from the costs of building and maintaining nuclear plants, the potential dangers of plant malfunctions and the storage of hazardous radioactive wastes were major concerns. In 1978, an accident occurred at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in central Pennsylvania, when a loss of coolant from the reactor core caused a partial meltdown and some release of radioactivity into the immediate vicinity. No new construction of a nuclear plant has been started since the Three Mile Island accident. 

More recently, nuclear energy has increasingly come to be seen as a practical way for the United States to meet rising energy demands while releasing less carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and, simultaneously, increasing energy security. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT2005) contained several provisions designed to encourage construction of new nuclear power plants, including a production tax credit of 1.8 cents per kilowatthour for up to 6 gigawatts of new nuclear capacity brought on line before 2021. The credit was authorized for the first 8 years of a plant’s operation and up to $125 million for each 1,000-megawatt unit. EPACT2005 also authorized Federal risk insurance for companies building the next six nuclear power plants. In addition, EPACT2005 Title 17 included a provision enabling the Government to guarantee loans for the construction of new energy technologies “that reduce or avoid greenhouse gases,” including nuclear power plants. The Secretary of Energy was given the authority, upon choosing a project, to guarantee a loan of up to 80 percent of the project’s cost. Such loan guarantees could decrease the costs of nuclear power significantly, by reducing interest rates on the debt and allowing higher debt-to-equity ratios. 

By 2010, 23 entities are expected to have submitted combined license applications for the construction of 34 new power plants in the United States.e It may, however, take many more years to get plants built in the United States than in either China or India, and any negative (or positive) experiences in those countries could have impacts on U.S. public opinion that would affect efforts to develop new nuclear plants. 

In the IEO2008 reference case, 17 gigawatts of new nuclear capacity is projected to come on line by 2030. The nuclear share of total U.S. electricity generation remains below 20 percent throughout most of the forecast, however, as older nuclear plants are retired and new generators of other types, especially coal-fired, are built.

 






aInternational Atomic Energy Association, “Power Reactor Information System,” web site www.iaea.org/programmes/a2/index. html; and “China’s Nuclear Power Aspirations,” Energy Biz Insider (December 12, 2007).

b“China’s Nuclear Power Aspirations,” Energy Biz Insider (December 12, 2007). 

cWorld Nuclear Association, "Nuclear Power in India," Information Paper (July 2008), web site www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf53. html. 

d“India’s Nuclear Hopes Hit the Buffers,” Power In Asia, No. 489 (October 25, 2007), pp. 8-9.

eU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Expected New Nuclear Power Plant Applications,” web site www.nrc.gov/reactors/ new-licensing/new-licensing-files/expected-new-rx-applications.pdf (updated July 9, 2008).