National Institute for Literacy
 

[LearningDisabilities 1078] Re: The California Plan

robinschwarz1 at aol.com robinschwarz1 at aol.com
Mon Apr 16 11:57:49 EDT 2007


Let me put in a plea again here for helping the learners learn what it
is they need and not constantly expecting them to wait for a trained
teacher to provide it, which is , as we all know, a very hit and miss
approach. With such an approach, the student is always at the mercy of
the training of the teachers and those teachers' interpretation of
their training and the learners's needs, rather than the learner being
in charge of his or her own needs. Can you imagine someone telling
you when and what kind of Kleenex you should use if you have a runny
nose? This is essentially what happens.

As I mentioned on one of these lists, at the school for persons with
LD at which I taught in Washington, DC, even the youngest kids ( 5 or 6
years old) are taught how to talk about what their challenges are and
ask for what they need to learn. It is quite astonishing to ask an 8 yr
old why he is using crayonsfor writing and have him answer that h s
motor skills are not well developed and it is easier to write with
crayons than with pencils.

Obviously adolescent or adults can easily be taught to advocate like
this once they have the information about their challenges from good
screenings. Elaine points out that many learners already know they
need less light and self-accommodate by having hats, hoods, etc and
seeking out less light. This is the kind of information they need to
see as part of their "learning prescription" and that should not be in
the hands of teachers only. And she rightly points out as well that
many school rules contradict what the learner already knows about him-
or herself rather than reinforcing that knowledge. It is good to
hear the school was able to change its rule about hats and hoods and
that Irlen filters are readily available.

A reminder that Irlen filters and a hat with a brim or a visor can be
used as an accommodation for the GED without any supporting paper work.
The learner has only to ask to use them-- some testing centers provide
them; others permit learners to come with their own.

Robin Lovrien Schwarz



-----Original Message-----
From: bdsunmt at sbcglobal.net
To: learningdisabilities at nifl.gov
Sent: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 3:25 PM
Subject: [LearningDisabilities 1049] The California Plan

I widely distributed the email on LD specialists from Judy Campbell
in Washington state to teachers and administrators in our district, and
received these replies. Oakland Adult and Career Education is an
integral program in the Oakland Unified School District; we have High
School Subjects (participation in which can lead to a HS diploma), ABE,
and GED programs as well as Career and Technology, ESL, Elderly Adults
and Adults with Disabilities programs. The first reply is from Elaine
Brooks who is a counselor in the HS subjects program; the second is the
assistant to the director of OACE. HS subjects and all interested
teachers recently attended a workshop conducted by our HS reading
specialist, Jennifer Block.

from Elaine Brooks

The training we had was geared toward making accommodations in class
in methods of instruction, amount of light, use of rocking chairs,
wrist bands, Irlen Filters, ways to ask questions on tests without
causing failure simply by way item was presented, etc. For example,
there is something called a "crossing the midline" problem which can be
remediated by simple exercises that Jennifer Block begins every class
with. Students with that problem cannot answer questions that are put
in a "not" form, such as "Which one of these was NOT a cause of the
Civil War?" Those same students cannot subtract and divide. However,
with these exercises, which they can be taught to do for themselves
prior to class, it's a whole different story. Students with scotopic
sensitivity tend to seek out the least light corner of the room, and
wear hats with brim and sweatshirts with hoods up even in hot weather.
At the time, hats were not permitted for male students at Shands. We
had to stop that rule in order for those students to be able to read.
Using colored paper and columns for reading was also helpful. There are
many simple things that any trained teacher can spot and accommodate.
Elaine

Christian Nelson <Christian.Nelson at ousd.k12.ca.us> wrote: I believe
she is referring to the model that is in place in most California
Community Colleges. I believe that most of them have an LD specialist
that does what is indicated below. When I worked in SF 10 years ago
with homeless and low income students, the LD specialist was a resource
for community college students. Because the CBO I worked for had CC
teachers, our students were able to access the services as well. The
testing and assessment was very detailed and comprehensive. The
drawback was that there was only one person serving as an LD specialist
which meant that students had to wait many weeks to get an appointment
depending on the time of the year. We could have sent more there for
assessment but it wasn’t always worth the time to get information that
didn’t always assist us in developing a learning plan for the student.
It helped those students who were moving on full time to CC and needed
accommodation.

An FYI, Neil Sturomski worked with my program specifically to help us
to learn to diagnose LD in our students.

Christian M. Nelson
Assistant Director
Oakland Adult & Career Education
1025 Second Avenue, Portable 15
Oakland, CA 94606


--------

From: Bonnita Solberg [mailto:bdsunmt at sbcglobal.net]
Subject: Chair of Practitioner's Task Force on Adults with LD


Does anyone know what the "California model" is Judy is referring to?
what a cutting edge project--Learning Disability specialists at the
Adult Ed level. Bonnita

"Campbell, Judy" <jcampbell at iel.spokane.edu> wrote:
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:30:44 -0700
From: "Campbell, Judy" <jcampbell at iel.spokane.edu>
To: "The Learning Disabilities Discussion List"
<learningdisabilities at nifl.gov>
Subject: [LearningDisabilities 1043] Re: Fwd: Chair of Practitioner's
Task
Forceon Adults with LD





In 1999, in Washington State, we were fortunate to be part of a
federal grant called a Quality Initiative. Our state chose to focus on
learning disabilities. With the ongoing support of the Office of Adult
Literacy (who had previously provided the opportunity for statewide
learning disabilities training for teachers and DSS counselors by
Nancie Payne and Neil Sturomski) and our administrators, we created a
systematic process (based on the California model) for identifying
(flagging), screening, interviewing, referring, diagnostic/prescriptive
teaching, and requesting GED accommodations if needed.



In our Adult Ed program we have two certified Learning Disability
Specialists. (We cover 6 counties.) We both meet individually with
students who have been referred through counselors or teachers or are
self referred. We screen, interview, teach study skills and learning
strategies, work with teachers, make referrals, tutor, teach mini
workshops, provide teacher trainings, and request GED accommodations.



I think a key issue is that Special Education students don’t go away
just because they become adults. Being able to read, write and do math
to 10th grade level is a great benefit to being successful in the adult
world. Those with lower skills often do not have a high school diploma,
end up on some sort of state support—TANF or prison. Many have mental
health problems which are complicated by poor decision-making and
problem solving processes. Having a learning disabilities
specialist—which is VERY,VERY,VERY, different from most Disabilities
Support Service persons---is a contributor to the retention and success
of students. The first year we provided services to 12 students. This
year we have provided services to 250 students so far. We can say with
confidence that the services we provide allow students to be successful
who would never have made progress or reached their educational goals
before the system was in place.



What made our systematic approach successful was the federal and
state funding to get training, the support of the administrators who
recognized the need for funded positions like Learning Disability
Specialists to work with students with learning challenges, and the
passion of instructors willing to do the work to take on a new role to
serve students.



For the past two years we have been fortunate to be part of the
Universal Design for Learning Federal grant through Renton Technical
College. With the funding from this grant we have been able to do even
more for our program. With the focus on improving access to education
to all students (UDL) we have purchased assistive technology, classroom
materials and books, and paid for teacher to access workshops and
conferences. This has truly been another big step forward for us.



We need Washington State to address the funding needs to keep this
systematic process in place and to create a policy so all community
colleges in the state have a Learning Disability Specialist and a
system for serving students with learning disabilities

Judy A. Campbell
Learning Disabilities Specialist
IEL/ABE/CCS


--------










----------------------------------------------------
National Institute for Literacy
Learning Disabilities mailing list
LearningDisabilities at nifl.gov
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/learningdisabilities


________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at AOL.com.
=0



More information about the LearningDisabilities mailing list