Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Dermabond Skin Adhesives vs Skin Staples for Closure of Repeat Cesarean Section Skin Incisions
This study has been terminated.
( Resident project--resident left institution and was not picked up by anyone else )
Study NCT00505856   Information provided by Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
First Received: July 23, 2007   Last Updated: December 11, 2008   History of Changes
This Tabular View shows the required WHO registration data elements as marked by

July 23, 2007
December 11, 2008
July 2007
 
 
Complete list of historical versions of study NCT00505856 on ClinicalTrials.gov Archive Site
 
 
 
Dermabond Skin Adhesives vs Skin Staples for Closure of Repeat Cesarean Section Skin Incisions
Dermabond Skin Adhesives vs Skin Staples for Closure of Repeat Cesarean Section Skin Incisions

The use of dermabond skin adhesive vs. skin staples for the closure of repeat c-section incisions.

This research is interested in using Dermabond skin adhesive as a closure for repeat cesarean incisions. The current standard of practice is to close these incisions with either skin surgical staples or suture. We will compare the use of Dermabond vs. the use of skin surgical staples in the closure of these incisions. Eightenn-50 year old pregnant patients are eligible for this study. Other inclusion criteria are history of a previous Pfannenstiel (transverse) incision and no evidence of infection at the incision site. Exclusion criteria include a previous vertical incision and active infection at the incision site. Patients will be enrolled during their prenatal appointments and the Texas Tech OB/GYN clinic, Grand Expectations, and the Southwest OB/GYN Associates offices. They will be consented by faculty, residents, and nursing staff. This is a preliminary study of 50 patients (25 in experimental arm, i.e. Dermabond and 25 in the control group, i.e. surgical skin staples). Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion by placing the terms "Dermabond" and "Staples" in a sealed envelope. The envelopes will be kept in the Family Birth Center under lock and key. The envelopes will be opened at the time of repeat c-section. A data set will be collected prior to randomization and include: gravidity, parity, age, BMI (weight and height), comorbid diseases and ethnic background. At the time of closure, there will be subcutaneous reapproximation of tissue to take the tension off of the skin. This will occur for all subjects. The type of suture used and the suturing technique will be recorded. The skin edges will be closed with either Dermabond per label directions or with skin staples, depending on randomization. The length of the incision, the type of suture used, the type of stitch used and the total number of layers closed will also be documented. The number of staples will also be documented. During the hospital stay, the patients wound will be examined on post operative day one and three. At this time, wound characteristics will be documented using a modified Hollander scale. A digital photograph of the incision will also be taken. The patient will also be given a patient satisfaction survey about their wound. The patients will then be seen at two weeks post partum and again at six weeks post partum. The wound characteristics and patient satisfaction will again be documented using the above materials.

Other data that will be collected includes the incidence of wound infection, as documented by wound culture, wound separation rates as documented by need for wound packing and wound dehiscence.

 
Observational
Prospective
Pregnancy
 
 
 

*   Includes publications given by the data provider as well as publications identified by National Clinical Trials Identifier (NCT ID) in Medline.
 
Terminated
50
December 2007
 

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pregant; between ages of 18-50; previous cesarean section with a transverse (sideways) skin incision.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous vertical (Up and Down) skin incision; active infection at site of incison
Female
18 Years to 50 Years
Yes
 
United States
 
 
NCT00505856
 
 
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
 
Principal Investigator: Robert Casanova, MD Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
December 2008

 †    Required WHO trial registration data element.
††   WHO trial registration data element that is required only if it exists.