FFY 2000 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care
by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative
Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider
Summary | 8-Consumer Education |
Reason for Care Chart | Ages
Chart
The entire collection of tables and charts is available
in Excel document. |
Child
Care and Development Fund Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation (FFY 2000) |
State | Licensed / Regulated | Legally Operating Without Regulation |
---|---|---|
Alabama | 74% | 26% |
Alaska | 55% | 45% |
American Samoa | 100% | 0% |
Arizona | 88% | 12% |
Arkansas | 100% | 0% |
California | 76% | 24% |
Colorado | 76% | 24% |
Connecticut | 43% | 57% |
Delaware | 81% | 19% |
District of Columbia | 100% | 0% |
Florida | 92% | 8% |
Georgia | 91% | 9% |
Guam | 31% | 69% |
Hawaii | 18% | 82% |
Idaho | 57% | 43% |
Illinois | 44% | 56% |
Indiana | 39% | 61% |
Iowa | 74% | 26% |
Kansas | 85% | 15% |
Kentucky | 73% | 27% |
Louisiana | 64% | 36% |
Maine | 76% | 24% |
Maryland | 72% | 28% |
Massachusetts | 86% | 14% |
Michigan | 34% | 67% |
Minnesota | 63% | 37% |
Mississippi | 78% | 22% |
Missouri | 86% | 14% |
Montana | 88% | 12% |
Nebraska | 76% | 24% |
Nevada | 72% | 28% |
New Hampshire | - | - |
New Jersey | 85% | 15% |
New Mexico | 47% | 53% |
New York | 47% | 53% |
North Carolina | 96% | 4% |
North Dakota | 96% | 4% |
Northern Mariana Islands | 100% | 0% |
Ohio | 100% | 0% |
Oklahoma | 100% | 0% |
Oregon | 45% | 55% |
Pennsylvania | 59% | 42% |
Puerto Rico | 53% | 47% |
Rhode Island | 80% | 20% |
South Carolina | 85% | 15% |
South Dakota | 81% | 19% |
Tennessee | 87% | 13% |
Texas | 83% | 17% |
Utah | 45% | 55% |
Vermont | 83% | 17% |
Virgin Islands | 88% | 12% |
Virginia | 85% | 15% |
Washington | 67% | 33% |
West Virginia | 93% | 7% |
Wisconsin | 100% | 0% |
Wyoming | 50% | 50% |
National | 74% | 26% |
Notes:
1. | The source for this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2000. |
2. | New Hampshire did not report the number of children by setting type. |
3. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
4. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care
by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative
Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider
Summary | 8-Consumer Education |
Reason for Care Chart | Ages
Chart |