FFY 2000 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care
by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated
| 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail
| 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer
Education | Reason for Care Chart
| Ages Chart
The entire collection of tables and charts is available
in Excel document. |
Child Care and Development Fund Of Children in Settings Legally Operating Without Regulation, Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives (FFY 2000) |
State | Relative | Non-Relative |
---|---|---|
Alabama | 28% | 72% |
Alaska | 31% | 69% |
American Samoa | - | - |
Arizona | 100% | 0% |
Arkansas | - | - |
California | 63% | 37% |
Colorado | 44% | 56% |
Connecticut | 73% | 27% |
Delaware | 45% | 55% |
District of Columbia | 73% | 27% |
Florida | 16% | 84% |
Georgia | 22% | 78% |
Guam | 65% | 35% |
Hawaii | 60% | 40% |
Idaho | 51% | 49% |
Illinois | 56% | 44% |
Indiana | 34% | 66% |
Iowa | 26% | 74% |
Kansas | 77% | 23% |
Kentucky | 62% | 38% |
Louisiana | 20% | 80% |
Maine | 33% | 67% |
Maryland | 80% | 20% |
Massachusetts | 58% | 42% |
Michigan | 75% | 25% |
Minnesota | 34% | 66% |
Mississippi | 65% | 35% |
Missouri | 25% | 75% |
Montana | 10% | 90% |
Nebraska | 0% | 100% |
Nevada | 9% | 91% |
New Hampshire | - | - |
New Jersey | 33% | 67% |
New Mexico | 67% | 33% |
New York | 40% | 60% |
North Carolina | 80% | 20% |
North Dakota | 100% | 0% |
Northern Mariana Islands | - | - |
Ohio | - | - |
Oklahoma | - | - |
Oregon | 25% | 75% |
Pennsylvania | 26% | 74% |
Puerto Rico | 51% | 49% |
Rhode Island | 74% | 26% |
South Carolina | 1% | 99% |
South Dakota | 74% | 26% |
Tennessee | 18% | 82% |
Texas | 100% | 0% |
Utah | 45% | 55% |
Vermont | 12% | 88% |
Virgin Islands | 44% | 56% |
Virginia | 73% | 27% |
Washington | 68% | 32% |
West Virginia | 80% | 20% |
Wisconsin | - | - |
Wyoming | 49% | 51% |
National | 50% | 50% |
Notes:
1. | The source of this table is ACF-800 data for FFY 2000. |
2. | American Samoa, Arkansas, Northern Marianas, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin did not report having children served in settings legally operating without regulation. |
3. | New Hampshire did not report the number of children by setting type. |
4. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
5. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart |