Quantcast
Environmental Health Perspectives Free Trail Issue
Author Keyword Title Full
About EHP Publications Past Issues News By Topic Authors Subscribe Press International Inside EHP Email Alerts spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and news on the impact of the environment on human health. EHP is published by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.DISCLAIMER
spacer
NIEHS
NIH
DHHS
spacer
Current Issue

EHP Science Education Website




Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)

spacer
Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 105, Number 6, June 1997 Open Access
spacer
Exotic Invasion Exotic Invasion

John Tibbets

Abstract


Exotic species are booming in population around the world, killing native plants and animals and endangering human health by introducing parasites and pathogens. Once exotics take hold in an environment, they can be extremely difficult to eliminate. Biological invaders are especially a problem in regions where extensive international trade occurs. For example, about 46% of New Zealand's species are nonnative, compared to about 1% of Tanzania's species.

Human pathogens hitchhike across borders and oceans, stowing away on research animals, tropical fruits and vegetables, creatures imported as pets, and mosquitoes. Ballast water is another frequent conveyance for exotic pests. When a ship enters port, its ballast water is dumped, spilling out exotic species that may include human pathogens and toxic algae.

Biological invasions are exacerbated when exotics spread from freshwater ports into rivers and inland lakes. In the United States, the zebra mussel, introduced to the Great Lakes in 1986, has already spread as far away as Louisiana and Tennessee. There is a chance it could eventually reach California.

Most governments have been disorganized and unfocused in their response to exotics, with the notable exceptions of Australia and New Zealand, which use aggressive and often controversial methods of ridding themselves of imported pests. But, while Australia may use questionable methods to get rid of exotics, at least it has a focused national agenda to cope with invaders. In contrast, the United States has no national policy to deal with biological invasions.

At the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, 165 nations signed the United Nations Convention on Biodiversity. The treaty's sole initiative toward controlling exotics does not have the authority of international law. However, the Jakarta Mandate, formulated by the parties in 1995, offers guidance on controlling exotic species in the marine environment, though it, too, is not legally binding. In July 1996, parties to the biodiversity convention met in Trondheim, Norway, to discuss the issue of exotic species, but no further guidelines were issued at that time.


The full version of this article is available for free in HTML format.
spacer
 
Open Access Resources | Call for Papers | Career Opportunities | Buy EHP Publications | Advertising Information | Subscribe to the EHP News Feeds News Feeds | Inspector General USA.gov