Health and Respirable Particulate (PM10) Air Pollution: A Causal or Statistical Association?
John F. Gamble and R. Jeffrey Lewis Exxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc., East Millstone, New Jersey 08875-2350 Abstract Numerous studies have reported weak but statistically significant acute health effects of particulate air pollution. The associations are observed at levels below the current U.S. standard of 150 g/m3 (24 hr) . Health effects include acute increased mortality from cardiopulmonary conditions and acute morbidity such as hospital admissions for related diseases. We reviewed recent epidemiology studies to evaluate whether criteria for causality are met, and we conclude that they are not. The weak associations are as likely to be due to confounding by weather, copollutants, or exposure misclassification as by ambient particulate matter (PM) . The results from the same metropolitan areas are inconsistent, and PM explains such a small amount of the variability in mortality/morbidity that the association has little practical significance. Finally, experimental chamber studies of susceptible individuals exposed to PM concentrations well above 150 g/m3 provide no evidence to support the morbidity/mortality findings. None of the criteria for establishing causality of the PM/mortality hypothesis are clearly met at ambient concentrations common in many U.S. cities. Key words: air pollution, air quality standards, causality, confounding, ecologic time-series studies, epidemiology, morbidity, mortality, particulate matter, weather. Environ Health Perspect 104:838-850 (1996) Address correspondence to J.F. Gamble, Exxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc., Mettlers Road, CN 2350, East Millstone, NJ 08875-2350 USA. This work was partially funded by the Institute of Petroleum, London, England. Received 27 October 1995 ; accepted 11 April 1996. The full version of this article is available for free in HTML format. |