Federal Trade Commission File a Complaint with the FTC Order Publications FTC's Privacy Poilicy Search the entire FTC website
Charity Fraud Charity Fraud Homepage
Consumer Information Section Information for Nonprofits & Business Section Press Room Section Resources Section En Español section
HotLinks

Charitable Donation$:
Give or Take
[TXT] [PDF]

Consumer Alert!
Public Safety Fund-Raising Appeals: Make Your Donations Count

[TXT] [PDF]

Business:
Facts for Business Donating to Public Safety Fund-Raisers

[TXT] [PDF]

Nonprofit:
Facts for Nonprofits Raising Funds? What to Know About Hiring a Professional

[TXT] [PDF]

PRESS ROOM

FTC Warns Consumers about Potential Charity Scams (August 19, 2004)
[TXT]

FTC Issues Consumer Publication on Charity Scams (February 11, 2004)
[TXT]

Court Closes the Book on Charity Scam (December 17, 2003)
[TXT]

Giving Wisely This Holiday Season (November 25, 2003)
[TXT]

FTC Warns Consumers about Potential Charity Scams (November 25, 2003)
[TXT]

Press Release: Operation Phoney Philanthropy (May 20, 2003)
[TXT]

(EN ESPANOL)Comunicado de Prensa: (20 de mayo de 2003)
OperaciĆ³n "Phoney Philanthropy" (Fraude de RecaudaciĆ³n de Donaciones Caritativas)
[TXT]

Illinois ex rel. Madigan v. Telemarketing Associates, Inc. (01-1806)
Argued March 3, 2003 -- Decided May 5, 2003
Opinion author: Ginsburg
[TXT]

Respondents, Illinois for-profit fundraising corporations and their owner (collectively Telemarketers), were retained by VietNow National Headquarters, a charitable nonprofit corporation, to solicit donations to aid Vietnam veterans. The contracts between those parties provided, among other things, that Telemarketers would retain 85 percent of the gross receipts from Illinois donors, leaving 15 percent for VietNow. The Illinois Attorney General filed a complaint in state court, alleging, inter alia, that Telemarketers represented to donors that a significant amount of each dollar donated would be paid over to VietNow for specifically identified charitable endeavors, and that such representations were knowingly deceptive and materially false, constituted a fraud, and were made for Telemarketers' private pecuniary benefit.

Previous Cases

Amended Telemarketing Sales Rule
[PDF]

Federal Trade Commission: FOR THE CONSUMER