Summaries of Court Actions are given pursuant to Section 705 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Summaries of Court Actions report cases involving seizure proceedings, criminal proceedings, and injunction proceedings. Seizure proceedings are civil actions taken against goods alleged to be in violation, and criminal and injunction proceedings are against firms or individuals charged to be responsible for violations. The cases generally involve foods, drugs, devices, or cosmetics alleged to be adulterated or misbranded or otherwise violative of the law when introduced into and while in interstate commerce.Summaries of Court Actions are prepared by Food and Drug Division, Office of the General Counsel, HHS, and are published by direction of the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
PRODUCT: Infant formula, at Brooklyn, N.Y. (E.D.N.Y.); Civil Action No. CV-96-1687.
CHARGED 4-9-96: While held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce at Sunset Merchandising, Inc., in Brooklyn, N.Y., the article was adulterated in that it did not contain the required nutrient inositol--412(a)(1). The article was also adulterated in that it failed to bear a lot code--412(a)(3). The article was misbranded in that it was represented to be for special dietary use because the label stated that the product was infant formula--403(j). The article was also misbranded in that the label failed to bear nutrient information, a statement of the number of fluid ounces supplying kilocalories, a statement of the amount of each of several nutrients supplied by 100 kilocalories, and the weight and volume of powdered formula to be reconstituted--403(j).
DISPOSITION: A default decree of condemnation and destruction ordered the article destroyed. (F.D.C. No. 67136; S. No. 96-752-707; S.J. No. 2)
PRODUCT: Shrimp, frozen, at Los Angeles, Calif. (C.D. Calif.); Civil Action No. 94-4660-JSL.
CHARGED 7-12-94: While held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce at Los Angeles Cold Storage in Los Angeles, Calif., the articles were adulterated in that they consisted of decomposed shrimp--402(a)(3).
DISPOSITION: A consent decree of condemnation ordered the articles destroyed. (F.D.C. No. 66995; S. No. 94-713-500; S.J. No. 3)
PRODUCT: Shrimp, frozen, at St. Petersburg, Fla. (M.D. Fla.); Civil Action No. 94-1386-Civ-T-23(C).
CHARGED 10-6-94: While held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce at Sigma International, Inc., in St. Petersburg, Fla., the articles were adulterated in that they consisted of decomposed shrimp--402(a)(3).
DISPOSITION: The articles were reconditioned. (F.D.C. No. 67009; S. No. 94-681-792; S.J. No. 4)
PRODUCT: Smoked sprats, at Brooklyn, N.Y. (E.D.N.Y.); Civil Action No. CV 95-2406.
CHARGED 6-14-95: While held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce at International Gold Star Trading Company, in Brooklyn, N.Y., the articles were adulterated in that they were prepared and packed under conditions whereby they might have been rendered injurious to health--402(a)(4).
DISPOSITION: The articles were destroyed. (F.D.C. No. 67087; S. No. 94-752-104; S.J. No. 5)
PRODUCT: Oxygen, at Virginia Beach, Va. (E.D. Va.); Civil Action No. 2:96CV382.
CHARGED 4-17-96: While held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce at Liberty Home Health Care, d/b/a Oxygen Specialties in Virginia Beach, Va., the articles were adulterated in that the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, their manufacture, processing, packing, and holding were not in conformity with current good manufacturing practice requirements--501(a)(2)(B). The articles were misbranded in that their labeling failed to bear the required statement "Caution: Federal law prohibits dispensing without prescription"--503(b)(4).
DISPOSITION: A consent decree of condemnation ordered the articles destroyed. (F.D.C. No. 67133; S. No. 96-703-958; S.J. No. 7)
PRODUCT: Oxygen, at Monona, Wis. (W.D. Wis.); Civil Action No. 96C-744-S.
CHARGED 8-27-96: While held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce at Apria Healthcare, Inc., in Monona, Wis., the articles were adulterated in that the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, their manufacture, processing, packing, and holding were not in conformity with current good manufacturing requirements--501(a)(2)(B).
DISPOSITION: The articles were reconditioned. (F.D.C. No. 67146; S. No. 96-719-113; S.J. No. 8)
PRODUCT: Topical creams and gels, at Miami Lakes, Fla. (S.D. Fla.); Civil Action No. 94-2507-CIV-Marcus.
CHARGED 11-23-94: While held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce at Tex International, Inc., in Miami Lakes, Fla., the articles were new drugs without an approved application--505(a). The articles were misbranded in that their labels failed to bear the established names of the drugs, and they failed to bear adequate directions for use--502(e)(1)(A)(i) and 502(f)(1). The articles were also misbranded in that they were not duly listed as required, and their labels failed to bear the statement "Caution: Federal law prohibits dispensing without a prescription"--502(o) and 503(b)(4).
DISPOSITION: A consent decree of condemnation, destruction and re-exportation was filed. Some of the articles were destroyed, and the others were exported to Italy. (F.D.C. No. 67030; S. No. 94-682-308; S.J. No. 9)
FDA Consumer magazine (May-June 1997)