![]() |
Search Options | |||
Index | Site Map | FAQ | Facility Info | Reading Rm | New | Help | Glossary | Contact Us | ![]() |
POLICY ISSUE SECY-08-0063 May 1, 2008
To update the Commission with regard to the staff's activities to evaluate scientific information about radiation health effects and the radiation protection recommendations of national and international organizations. This paper does not address any new commitments or resource implications. In the past, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has followed the basic radiation protection recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and its U.S. counterpart, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), in formulating its basic radiation protection standards. Title 10, Part 20, "Standards for Protection Against Radiation," of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 20) sets forth the agency's standards for radiation protection. The NRC completed its last major revision of these standards with the publication of a Federal Register notice (56 FR 23360) on May 21, 1991. In response to a staff proposal to update the agency's regulations concerning byproduct and source material (SRM-SECY-02-0196, "Recommendations Stemming from the Systematic Assessment of Exemptions from Licensing in 10 CFR Parts 30 and 40; and a Rulemaking Plan for Risk-Informing 10 CFR Parts 30, 31, and 32," dated November 17, 2003), the Commission directed the staff to do the following: [P]rovide the Commission with a comprehensive plan for evaluating the latest scientific information and the recommendations of the international/national radiation protection organizations for possible incorporation into our regulatory activities, policies, and regulations. This plan should include evaluation of all major efforts scheduled to be completed in the next several years, and lead to staff recommendations on the need to revise NRC's regulatory program. The staff subsequently transmitted a review plan to the Commission in SECY-04-0055, "Plan for Evaluating Scientific Information and Radiation Protection Recommendations," dated April 7, 2004, and the Commission approved that plan on May 13, 2004. In the plan, the staff committed to provide the Commission with annual status reports, including progress summaries, concerning the activities associated with evaluating scientific information about radiation health effects and the radiation protection recommendations of national and international organizations. This paper is the fourth annual status report. Ongoing scientific work continues to increase understanding of the health effects and risks associated with radiation exposure. To date, most of this understanding has derived from studies of Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Toward that end, in 2005, the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (a private, nonprofit organization supported by the governments of Japan and the United States) revised the system for assigning radiation doses to the atomic bomb survivors from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the foundation is expected to update its related cancer risk estimates in the near future. Currently, these cancer risk estimates provide the fundamental basis for estimating radiation-induced health effects. To address the issue of the effect of low doses of radiation on human health, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) initiated a 10-year research program in 1999 to better characterize radiation effects on cells and molecules. Investigators funded under that program meet periodically to discuss progress on individual research projects, and NRC staff representatives participate in these discussions. To date, DOE has reported a significant increase in new techniques and instrumentation for use in measuring the biological and genetic changes induced by exposure to low doses of radiation. Other organizations also review current research findings and develop risk estimates on the basis of their reviews. In the international arena, for example, the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) also periodically examines the effects of radiation exposure from natural and manmade sources and published its most recent major report in 2000. UNSCEAR is currently reexamining the health effects of radiation exposure by evaluating epidemiological studies of radiation and health (cancer and noncancer illnesses), examining the mechanisms and consequences of radiation exposure in tissues, and examining the transport of radionuclides in the environment and their impact on ecosystems. UNSCEAR anticipates that it will publish its next report later this year. The NRC staff will continue to directly support the U.S. delegation to UNSCEAR by reviewing draft documents as they become available and by providing technical guidance, such as radiobiological and human health risk assessment expertise, to the delegation and the UNSCEAR secretariat during Committee deliberations. ICRP periodically reexamines its recommendations using scientific information, such as UNSCEAR reports, to decide whether new recommendations are needed. NRC staff, along with its Federal partners, provided Commission approved comments directly to ICRP and through other organizations such as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Nuclear Energy Agency on the latest revision of the recommendations. ICRP approved their new recommendations in March 2007 and published them as ICRP Publication 103, "The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection," on December 18, 2007. The ICRP recommendations did not differ substantially from what had already been considered by the NRC in earlier comments. Nevertheless, the staff is currently analyzing the need to update NRC's radiation protection regulations and guidance, and will provide options for Commission consideration in December 2008 as committed to in SECY‑07‑0036. Upon review of the ICRP recommendations, NCRP may also update its radiation protection recommendations. The enclosure The Office of the General Counsel reviewed this package and has no legal objection.
|
Privacy Policy |
Site Disclaimer |