Masthead: Home Link

Top contractors link
 Awards by contractor state
 Awards by cong. district of contractor
 Advanced search for contractors
Place of performance Congressional District list link
 Advanced search by place of performance.
Agency summary link
 Advanced search by agency
 By competition type
 By product or service provided

Contracts data was last updated on November 31, 2008 for all 24 CFO Act agencies at this time.

Assistance data was last updated on December 23, 2008 for 20 of 24 CFO act agencies. Updates are currently pending for the following agencies: DHS, HHS, NRC and TREAS.

For more details, please click here


Printer friendly display link PRINTER-FRIENDLY



Contracts to Contractors in South Carolina 1 (Henry E. Brown Jr.)
(FY 2006)

Searching...



Summary


Fiscal Year: 2006
Total dollars: $681,211,431
The amount for this search is 0.2% of all awarded dollars for the fiscal year.
This Congressional District is ranked 133 among districts for this year.
Total number of contractors: 531
Total number of transactions: 6,529
Get list of contractors
Get list of transactions

Extent of Competition Competition categories help link

Pie chart: in table form below
Available for everyone for competition$184,520,767
Everyone could compete, but only one bid or offer was recieved$32,117,696
Competition within a limited pool$194,759,195
Actions necessary to continue existing competitive contracts for continuity (until the next one could be competed)$779,500
Available only for groups such as disabled persons, prisoners, and regulated utilities$32,420,133
Not competed for an allowable reason$156,314,156
Not identified, soon to be addressed$80,299,983

Top 5 Known Congressional Districts where Work is Performed Known congressional district help link

South Carolina 1 (Henry E. Brown Jr.)$133,407,650
District of Columbia nonvoting (Eleanor Holmes Norton)$93,321,228
Florida 21 (Lincoln Diaz-Balart)$9,843,428
Virginia 2 (Thelma D. Drake)$6,030,187
South Carolina 6 (James E. Clyburn)$5,802,664

Top 5 Products or Services Sold

Guard Services$161,466,890
Maintenance, Repair and Rebuilding of Equipment -- Communication, Detection, and Coherent Radiation Equipment$62,346,390
Trucks and Truck Tractors, Wheeled$31,567,229
Motor Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Shop Specialized Equipment$31,459,997
Non-nuclear Ship Repair (East) Ship repair (including overhauls and conversions) performed on non-nuclear propelled and nonpropelled ships east of the 108th meridian$30,601,899

Top 5 Contracting Agencies Purchasing from Contractor(s)

NAVY, Department of the$284,219,065
ARMY, Department of the (except Corps of Engineers Civil Program Financing)$125,868,907
Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement$81,246,026
STATE, Department of$45,640,312
AIR FORCE, Department of the (Headquarters, USAF)$20,805,637

Top 10 Contractors

Coastal International Security, Inc.$168,248,016
Force Protection, Inc$109,092,739
Fuentez Systems Concepts Inc$57,915,240
Detyens Shipyards, Inc.$29,995,291
Wareonearth Communications, Inc$24,485,772
Advanced Technology Institute$21,382,102
Unavailable $17,612,830
Sea Containers America Inc$14,704,815
Brantley Construction Company, Inc.$13,813,700
Life Cycle Engineering, Inc.$13,164,477

Trend

Bar chart: in table form below

2000$0
2001$0
2002$0
2003$0
2004$391,190,674
2005$577,846,860
2006$681,211,431
2007$1,625,125,002
2008$1,668,498,489
2009 1Q * Partial year help link$33,438
*Note: FY 2009 only includes data for the first quarter.


*END OF REPORT*

This search was done on January 18, 2009.

The contracts database is compiled from the FPDS-NG system. For timeliness details, please see the Data Quality tab.

Note: The numbers in this table can change after each data load. Transactions included in a data load can impact numbers for the current and previous fiscal years.

The data housed on USASpending.gov is provided by Federal agencies. Please refer to the Data Quality site for information about the current status of data quality. USASpending.gov is continuously developing ways to measure and improve the quality of the data on the site.