From: Philip Friedman [phifri@frii.com] Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:13 PM To: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov Subject: Docket 00N-1396 & Docket 00D-1598 March 25, 2001 [Via email: fdadockets@oc.fda.gov] Docket 00N-1396 & Docket 00D-1598 Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 RE: Docket 00N-1396 & Docket 00D-1598 Dear Food and Drug Administration: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently announced new rules and guidance on genetically engineered (GE) foods. Unfortunately, despite overwhelming consumer demand, the agency has still failed to require safety testing and mandatory labeling for GE foods. Instead of mandating safety testing, the FDA’s new rule merely requires that food producers notify the agency before marketing a GE food. There is strong scientific evidence of numerous potential health and environmental risks of GE foods. These foods could be toxic, could cause allergic responses, could have lower nutrition value and could compromise immune responses in consumers. Under FDA’s new notification rule GE foods will reach supermarket shelves without any required testing for these human health problems, much less any review of their environmental risks. As a result, millions of consumers will continue to be unknowing guinea pigs testing the safety of these foods. THIS IS TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE TO ME. The proposed rules: * Do not require mandatory pre-market safety testing * Do not require pre-market environmental review * Do not require mandatory labeling of GE foods * Restrict voluntary labeling of non-GE foods * Require a mere letter of notification prior to the marketing of a GE food * Fail to ensure public access to adequate information for independent review * Are supported by industry and opposed by consumer groups I would like to add the following into the public record on the proposed new rules: * THE FDA MUST REQUIRE MANDATORY PRE-MARKET COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. Unlike conventional pollutants, where a given amount of pollutant causes a limited amount of damage, a small number of mutant genes could have a population explosion and reproduce forever, causing unlimited and irreparable damage. * THE FDA MUST REQUIRE MANDATORY PRE-MARKET LONG-TERM HEALTH TESTING. GE products could be toxic, cause allergic responses, have lower nutritional value, and compromise immune responses in consumers. * THE FDA MUST REQUIRE MANDATORY LABELING OF GE PRODUCTS. Without mandatory labeling, neither consumers nor health professionals will know if an allergic or toxic reaction was the result of a genetically engineered food. Consumers would be deprived of the critical knowledge needed to hold food producers liable should any of these novel products be hazardous. * THE FDA MUST END ITS COZY RELATIONSHIP WITH THE INDUSTRIES IT PURPORTS TO BE REGULATING. People have been allowed to work for a biotech company, then work for the FDA writing [and re-writing] regulatory rules on that company’s product, then go back to working for the company. Many FDA advisory committee meetings had at least one conflict of interest. Sincerely yours, Phil Friedman 201 So. Grant Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80521 970 493-2959 phifri@frii.com