Skip Navigation

U.S. Department of Health & Human ServicesLink to www.hhs.gov
OMH Home

En Español
The Office of Minority Health (Phone: 1-800-444-6472)
About OMH
Our Services
Campaigns/Initiatives
Press Releases
Calendar
Employment
Publications
Federal Clearinghouses
Research
OPHS Home
Image of a person asking a questionNeed Help?
Contact Us


Aids.gov - Access to U.S. Government HIV and AIDS information

To find HIV Test Centers near you Text: Your Zip Code To: KnowIt (566948) www.hivtest.org

HIV/AIDS Awareness Days
Join Our Mailing ListJoin Our Mailing List
Click to sign up


OMH Content via HealthDay

  Last Seven Days' Health News
Domestic Animals Owe Varied Coats to Humans

Study shows gene mutations for coloring, patterns exist only in livestock and pets

HealthDay news image for article titled: Domestic Animals Owe Varied Coats to Humans
FRIDAY, Jan. 16 (HealthDay News) -- The coat colors and patterns of wild and domestic animals are different primarily because of human intervention over thousands of years, a new study suggests.

A particular gene -- the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene -- plays a key role in the appearance of animals' coats. British researchers studying this gene in wild and domestic pigs found that nearly all DNA mutations in the farm animals changed the protein that affects coat color and pattern.

Some of the mutations were consecutive, or layered, indicating they had been perpetuated by farmers over thousands of years, the researchers said.

The mutations affecting the coat were not found in the wild pigs, which had a consistent black-brown coloring that acts as camouflage. Predators, the researchers believe, may have helped weed out any pigs with mutations that made them stand out in appearance.

"Early farmers may have decided to change the coat of their livestock for a number of reasons," study co-author Greger Larson, a research fellow in the department of archaeology at Durham University in England, said in a news release issued by the school. "One is that it facilitated animal husbandry since it is easier to keep track of livestock that are not camouflaged. Another could be that it has acted as a metaphor for the improved characteristics of the early forms of livestock compared with their wild ancestors."

But another possibility, Larson said, "is that the early farmers were as amused and as taken with biological novelty and diversity as we are today."

The study, done in conjunction with Uppsala University in Sweden, appears online in PLoS Genetics.

More information

The U.S. National Library of Medicine has more about gene mutations.

SOURCE: Durham University, news release, Jan. 15, 2009

Attribution: -- Kevin McKeever
SOURCE: Durham University, news release, Jan. 15, 2009
Copyright © 2009 ScoutNews, LLC Exit Disclaimer. All rights reserved.

HealthDayNews articles are derived from various sources and do not reflect federal policy.
omhrc.gov does not endorse opinions, products, or services that may appear in news stories.
Content Last Modified: 1/16/2009 2:00:00 PM
OMH Home  |  HHS Home  |  USA.gov  |  Disclaimer  |  Privacy Policy  |  HHS FOIA  |  Accessibility  |  Site Map  |  Contact Us  |  File Formats

Office of Minority Health
Toll Free: 1-800-444-6472 / Fax: 301-251-2160
Email: info@omhrc.gov

Provide Feedback