Summary: CSRAC Ad Hoc Working Group Comments on Integrated Review Groups

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS ON INTEGRATED REVIEW GROUPS

FROM AD HOC WORKING GROUPS

TO THE CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC REVIEW ADVISORY COMMITTEE

FEBRUARY 2002

Table of Contents

  1. Background
  2. Scope and Breadth of the Science Reviewed
  3. Appropriateness, Qualifications, and Stature of the Reviewers
  4. Policies, Procedures, and Management of the Meeting
  5. Accommodation of New Directions and Emerging Areas
  6. Fairness of Reviews for all the Grant Mechanisms
  7. Appendix: Ad Hoc Working Group Rosters

Background: In September 1998, the Center for Scientific Review (CSR) Advisory Committee recommended the formation of ad hoc Working Groups to provide advice on the organization, management, and leadership of the Initial Review Groups (IRGs) and their component study sections. The goal was to ensure that all applications assigned to the IRGs consistently receive high quality reviews. The Working Groups were to include active, widely respected researchers in disciplines related to those reviewed by the IRGs. Since then, all 19 Working Groups have been constituted, conducted their reviews of their assigned IRG, and reported their findings to the CSR Advisory Committee. (Rosters of the Working Groups are provided in an appendix to this summary.)

Charge: Each of the Working Groups reviewed the organization and operation of study sections within an IRG. They specifically assessed the scope and depth of the study sections review responsibilities, the distribution of topics and grant applications among study sections, shared interests between study sections, and the capability of the study sections to recognize and fairly assess novel approaches, concepts, and methodologies that may emerge in the portfolio of grant applications reviewed in the IRG. The Working Groups also examined the manner in which different grant mechanisms were reviewed and the consistency of review practices among the several study sections of the IRG. They considered the procedures and criteria used to select both charter and temporary members of the study sections and discussed ways these practices could be changed to improve the review process. The appropriateness of the specific areas of expertise represented among study section members was also examined. In addition, the Working Groups examined how Scientific Review Administrators (SRAs) chose reviewers and managed the review process to ensure fair, comprehensive, and consistent reviews.

The comments of the Working Groups tended to fall within five general areas: (1) scope and breadth of the science reviewed; (2) appropriateness, qualifications, and stature of the reviewers; (3) policies, procedures, and the management of the meeting; (4) accommodation of new directions and emerging areas; and (5) fairness of reviews for all the grant mechanisms.

The following is a summary of the Working Group observations and the actions taken by CSR.

[Back to Top]

Scope and Breadth of the Science Reviewed

Working Group Observations

Study Section Workload: Review workload has a significant impact on the effectiveness of the peer review process. Working Group members found that a study section workload of between 60 to 80 applications per review cycle was optimal. Study sections with review loads outside this range tended to show aberrations that had a negative impact on the quality of review and the morale of the reviewers, particularly study sections with over 90 or fewer than 50 applications to review. However, the number of applications alone does not insure an appropriately constituted study section. Several study sections with review loads within the 60 to 80 applications range were referred to as two (or even three) study sections meeting in the same room at the same time or were so scientifically broad that there were few experts for any one application. A few smaller study sections carried workloads of 50 applications or less because they reviewed unique applications that did not have obvious or appropriate homes elsewhere. Some clinical research study sections fell into this category. While it was recognized that the SRAs, Chairs, and reviewers worked well together to overcome these problems, it was hoped that the broader reorganization activities currently underway would be cognizant of these challenges.

Cohesiveness of Research Topics: Working Groups reported that the study sections in at least five IRGs needed to be examined to clarify shared interest, workload balance, or the cohesiveness of the research topics they covered. Of particular concern were all three neuroscience IRGs, the Endocrinology and Reproductive Sciences and the Nutritional and Metabolic Sciences IRGs and the Risk, Prevention and Health Behavior IRG.

Clustering of Research Topics: The Working Groups identified a number of areas that were either emerging, declining, or in need of clustering in order to achieve a critical mass of applications. They specifically noted a need to cluster clinical research, including parasitology, surgery, vaccine development and nutrition/metabolism, as well as muscle biology research and lipid and lipoprotein research. Informatics, proteomics, genomics, design-directed and hypothesis-generating research were recognized as emerging fields that CSR needed to address. Members of the Working Groups suggested that applications involving informatics as a tool should be reviewed within the context of the scientific question, whereas applications related to the development of informatics methodology should be reviewed separately.

CSR Actions

IRG Reorganization: As CSR has moved forward with the reorganization of IRGs, its reorganization teams (Study Section Boundary Teams) have been given those portions of the reports of the IRG Working Groups that relate to study section organization, and their attention has been drawn to the optimal study section size, clustering of scientific areas, and the problems of cohesiveness in certain existing study sections. These teams have also been charged with creating new study sections within the range of 60 to 80 applications or identifying alternatives that would ensure an appropriate review load that would not jeopardize scientific balance or cohesion.

Adjustments to Study Section Research Topics: In the meantime, CSR has implemented several recommendations for specific study sections that adjust scientific boundaries to accommodate workloads. Specifically, the Pathology C study section was created from the Pathology B and Metabolic Pathology study sections that had been reviewing just under 300 applications a round between them. In addition, adjustments have been made between the various study sections within the Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Neuroscience IRG to reestablish appropriate scientific boundaries and workloads. Adjustments are also being made to the following study sections to provide more appropriate focus and balance: Bio-organic and Natural Products Chemistry; Integrative, Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience 5 and 6; Medical Biochemistry; Medicinal Chemistry; and Orthopedics. The locus of the review of lipid/lipoprotein applications is problematic and will require the advice of the Study Section Boundary Teams. In March 2001, CSR convened a special ad hoc working group to provide advice on muscle biology. The CSR Advisory Committee accepted this group's report. The new Skeletal Muscle Biology study section met for the first time in October 2001. While Working Groups identified additional problems, they thought it best for CSR to wait and address them when the IRGs are reorganized. The Endocrinology and Reproductive Sciences IRG was one such example as were the Lung Biology and Pathology and the Surgery, Anesthesiology and Trauma study sections. The reorganization teams that will recommend new study sections from the set of applications that make up the current Endocrinology and Reproductive Sciences IRG and the Lung Biology and Pathology study section will meet in late spring 2002. And finally, the Bioengineering Sciences and Technology IRG Study Section Boundary Team recently met and recommended the formation of a study section that would be appropriate for the review of informatics and engineering-related applications.

[Back to Top]

Appropriateness, Qualifications, and Stature of the Reviewers

Working Group Observations

Qualifications and Diversity: With few exceptions, the Working Groups found reviewer expertise, qualifications, and fairness to be outstanding with a good mix of junior and senior reviewers. Nevertheless, the Working Group members indicated that many study sections could benefit from a cadre of more senior reviewers and clinicians.

Similarly, the Working Groups observed that the membership of many CSR study sections represents an appropriate balance of women and minorities reviewers. Still, diversity continues to be a problem for some study sections. The issue is usually, but not always, minorities rather than women. The Working Groups believed that it is important for CSR to renew its efforts to ensure appropriate representation.

Reviewer Commitment and Incentives: Working Group members were disturbed by what appeared to be a lack of commitment on the part of some reviewers as evidenced by late arrivals and early departures from meetings. Some members of the Working Groups suggested greater incentives, such as extending current grant periods, or larger honorarium, to encourage participation and commitment. Others suggested that a pool of senior reviewers that rotated among study sections would promote consistency across study sections. It was also suggested that National Institutes of Health (NIH) show greater flexibility in service.

CSR Actions

Reviewer Appointments: The Director of NIH sets the general terms of appointment for study section service through her Committee Management Office. CSR is discussing several modifications to the current appointment structure with this office. For example, the CSR Advisory Committee has endorsed the concept of a master reviewer category with a term of service significantly different from current regular membership service. Master reviewers could be used either as a floating pool of expertise within an IRG, or for less frequent service within a dedicated study section. There have also been additional discussions on methods for enhancing diversity on study sections.

Reviewer Incentives: The duration of an NIH grant, and any extension to it, is determined by the funding Institute, not CSR. The Director of CSR has discussed the recommendation of extending the term of a grant award for regular CSR reviewers with the Directors of the funding Institutes and Centers. The Directors, however, have been reluctant to implement such a plan because of the cost and the principle of not funding non-peer reviewed research.

[Back to Top]

Policies, Procedures, and Management of the Meeting

Working Group Observations

Reviewer Orientation: Working Group members acknowledged that CSR has developed a useful set of documents covering orientation of reviewers and Chairs and their roles. The orientation on polices and procedures at the beginning of the meeting are also effective. However, these documents and the orientation are not sufficient. There needs to be a more pro-active involvement of the Chair and SRA in the training of new and temporary members well before the meeting. Issues that should be covered include preparing a critique, de-emphasizing methodological details, scoring applications, and effectively presenting critiques during the meeting.

Study Section Chairs: Working Group members also observed that Chairs were almost always helpful, conscientious, and very effective as role models or mentors. A few Chairs, however, were less adept in developing consensus; incorporating temporary, new reviewer, and telephone or mail reviewer comments; or maintaining a positive environment at the meeting. Some Chairs were not sufficiently forceful in guiding the discussion towards an appropriate balance between methods and "impact," or in keeping the reviewers from reading their reviews verbatim. There was also inconsistent and uneven attention to the current five review criteria. Members of the Working Groups suggested that CSR explore ways to train Chairs in the art of group dynamics and consensus development, as well as in the policies and practices of peer review, before they assume their responsibilities.

Study Section and Reviewer Assignments: Some members of the Working Groups suggested that, when an applicant is dissatisfied with his or her study section assignment and the issue cannot be resolved by the SRAs, the Chairs of the relevant study sections should be consulted. Working Groups also noted that the assignment of applications to reviewers was usually appropriate. Nevertheless, Chairs, or another senior member of the study section, can provide positive assistance to the SRA in the assignment of applications to reviewers and should review the assignments before the mailing. However, they cautioned against individual reviewers being allowed to select which applications they would review. Working Groups also noted that there should be an appropriate workload for reviewers. More than 10 written review assignments were excessive and more than a total of 14 assignments, whether as readers or writers, was also excessive. Similarly, they observed that reviewers with fewer than 5 assignments would probably have difficulty calibrating their scores.

Electronic-Assisted Review: The Internet-assisted peer review module was seen as a very positive tool. However, its effectiveness in informing the discussion at the meeting was limited when access to others' reviews was less than 3 days before the meeting. The reviewers in the AIDS and Related Research IRG also lauded the pilot testing of CDs to distribute grant applications.

Telephone and Mail Reviewers, and Study Section Size: Reviews involving a telephone consultant were often a distraction and in the view of the Working Groups should be limited. They felt it was also difficult to judge the merits of written reviews from outside consultants. Telephone and written reviews were best received when the study section members knew the outside consultant. The number of reviewers at the meeting also affected the process. The ability to hear a review was compromised when there were more than 30 reviewers at the table, and more than 35 reviewers at the table was particularly problematic.

"Not Scoring" Applications: Opinions varied on the merits of "not scoring" applications and the process. Many felt that the practice helped focus the discussion at the meeting and made efficient use of time. Others were concerned about the impact of the "not scored" designation on new investigator applications. There was also a concern about over-attention to designating exactly 50 percent of the applications as "not scored." Working Groups voiced concern that the reviewers, particularly the new and temporary reviewers, could not calibrate their recommendations with the study section and that the study section recommendation was really not a consensus since there had been no discussion. This concern gave rise to a great deal of unease with the outcome. CSR was encouraged to explore ways to address these concerns.

Review of Patient-Oriented Research Applications: Many reviewers in study sections that see relatively few clinical research applications were found to be confused or frustrated by the numerous changes, the greater commentary detail required, and the overly long documentation on the proper way to evaluate the inclusion of women, minorities, and children. Working Group members suggested that CSR explore ways in which study sections can be better informed and guided through this process.

Scoring Applications: From the view of the Working Groups scoring applications presented at least two problems: clustering or compressing the range of scores, and "payline chasing." Payline chasing (reviewers recommending priority scores that they imagine will assure funding for a large number of applications) can lead to a high rate of revised applications and a disconnect between inherent merit and priority score. This is a particular problem for amended applications were there is often a sense of obligation to give a better score. Reviewers should be free to add their perspective and score appropriately. In some study sections, the Chair inappropriately discussed the "unofficial pay-line." Both clustering and payline chasing can have a negative impact on identifying the best research.

Modular Budgets: The modular budget process was largely disliked. Many Working Groups commented that the issue was not the modules per se, but the absence of any meaningful budget justification. Even though the Chairs and SRAs repeatedly asked for budget comments, the reviewers were often reluctant to provide advice. As a result, many reviewers, particularly newer reviewers, seemed to ignore the applicants' budget requests.

CSR Actions

Reviewer Training: In December 2001, CSR formed an internal team to develop a set of practices and guidelines that have been found effective in training new and temporary reviewers. The objective is to develop a standard process that can be used by SRAs to assure effective training of reviewers. A document will be produced that covers training on critique preparation, budget recommendations, scoring, and verbal delivery, as well as training on the guidelines for the inclusion of women, minorities, and children in clinical research. The issues raised by the Working Groups will be the central focus of this document.

Chair Training: CSR is exploring ways to provide effective assistance and training for Chairs. Issues that would be addressed include group dynamics, consensus development, managing the discussion process, and balancing considerations of impact versus methodology. This effort will involve polling current and recent Chairs for advice on the most appropriate topics and format. Options that are being considered include a 1-day training session for all new Chairs within an IRG or multiple IRGs that would involve former Chairs as potential instructors.

Study Section Meeting Management: In August 2000, following the initial IRG Working Group meetings, CSR began developing a Best Practices document for SRAs that included a wide range of advice on meeting management. This document is frequently updated and is posted on the CSR intranet. This document advises SRAs that they may involve the Chair in the resolution of difficult application assignments and the assignment of applications to reviewers before the mailing. The Best Practices document also advises SRAs on the number of reviewers at a meeting, appropriate reviewer assignment load (in keeping with the observations of the Working Groups), as well as on the number of telephone reviewers for a meeting. Other topics covered include (1) information to be provided reviewers before the review meeting, (2) the optimal and maximum number of applications assigned to a reviewer, (3) the presentation of mail reviews at the meeting; (4) streamlining applications; (5) the review of different grant mechanisms, and (6) feedback to the reviewers on their voting practices. This document is being used by the IRG Chiefs as a standard to help insure consistency in the peer review process across study sections.

Electronic-Assisted Review: Use of the Internet-assisted peer review module has been expanded to include most study sections. SRAs are placing great emphasis on encouraging the reviewers to submit their critiques in a timely manner. This active encouragement is showing some success in certain study sections. Full utilization of this tool may require time for a culture change from last minute preparation to preparation a week before the meeting. CSR is also expanding the use of CDs for distribution of applications to reviewers. Nearly all study sections will be using CDs by 2003.

Not Scoring Applications: CSR is exploring options for modifying the process of designating applications as "not scored." These options include greater reliance on the Internet assisted peer review module, a brief discussion at the study section meeting highlighting the weakness of the application, or an informal period at the beginning of the meeting where reviewers privately share their observations with the other assigned reviewers. CSR regards additional testing of these options and consideration of their consequences to be necessary before a large-scale change in practices is recommended.

Spreading Scores: In October 2001, the CSR Director charged a group of SRAs with codifying a set of practices that appear to be effective in helping study sections spread their scores. The study sections led by the SRAs on this internal group have excellent track records in this regard. A set of effective practices will be developed from this report and will become part of the Best Practices document available on the CSR intranet and will be integrated into the SRA training curriculum.

Modular Budgets: The Modular Budget format has been mandated by the Director of NIH and implemented by the Deputy Director for Extramural Research, NIH. The CSR has shared the comments of the IRG Working Groups with the NIH Office of Extramural Research, the office responsible for the implementation and evaluation of this policy. CSR has been advised that there will be an evaluation of the modular budget policy.

[Back to Top]

Accommodation of New Directions and Emerging Areas

Working Group Observations

Working Group members reported that, while there were many innovative applications (recognizing that the definition of "innovative" varies among reviewers), there were very few applications that could be categorized as truly novel or potentially high impact with inherent high risk. In general, it was felt that these applications were reviewed appropriately. Nevertheless, it was noted that there was a tendency for reviewers, particularly newer or less experienced reviewers, to dwell unnecessarily on methodological concerns. This may lead to the perceived frequency with which such applications need to be resubmitted, and thus a disincentive to submitting such applications. Working Group members suggested that greater representation of senior reviewers on study sections and improved training of new reviewers before the study section meeting could help rectify this trend.

CSR Actions

It is hoped that recruiting senior reviewers as mentioned above will help improve the balance and tenor of study section discussions and help reviewers better focus on the broader implications of the proposed research. The Best Practices document being developed to guide SRAs in training new and temporary reviewers will include a section on pre-meeting training to help reviewers put methodological concerns into perspective.

[Back to Top]

Fairness of Reviews for all the Grant Mechanisms

Working Group Observations

Working Groups reported on several applicant or application categories that are different from the standard R01s: AREA (R15), Fellowship (F31, F32, and F33), Exploratory (R21) applications, and R01 applications from new investigators. There was a strong sense that these applications receive appropriate review, but it was suggested that clustering them within the study sections or moving them to separate review groups could enhance peer review. Although not a universally held position, most Working Group members thought that Fellowship applications should be reviewed in separate study sections dedicated to such reviews. In addition, it was reported that greater attention needed to be given to the criteria for Exploratory (R21) applications. This funding mechanism is used in a variety of ways by the funding Institutes to achieve a range of very different goals and objectives. Finally, the term "new investigator" is too broadly defined by NIH and should be reconsidered.

CSR Actions

Beginning with the review meetings held in October 2001, most Fellowship applications will be reviewed in study sections dedicated to Fellowship applications. As for the review of other applications, CSR recognizes that it may not always be possible to cluster reviews within a study section due to the schedules of reviewers and program staff who may not be able to attend the entire meeting. Still, SRAs are being advised to cluster, where possible, the review of AREA (R15) and Exploratory (R21) applications.

[Back to Top]

Appendix: Ad Hoc Working Group Rosters


[Back to Top] | [Back to Roster Index]


AIDS & AIDS-Related Research (AARR) Working Group

Chairperson
Schoenbaum, Ellie E., MD
Professor
Department Of Epidemiology & Social Medicine
Albert Einstein College Of Medicine
Bronx, NY 10467-2490

Members
Clark, Alice M., PhD
Vice Chancellor
Office Of Research & Sponsored Programs
University Of Mississippi
School Of Pharmacy
University, MS 38677

Hunter, Eric, PhD
Director, AIDS Center
Professor Of Microbiology
Department Of Microbiology
University Of Alabama
Birmingham, AL 35294

Mascola, John R., MD
Deputy Director
Vaccine Research Center
National Institute Of Allergy & Infectious Diseases
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892

Patterson, Thomas, PhD
Professor
Department Of Psychiatry
University Of California
La Jolla CA 92093

Raab-Traub, Nancy J., PhD
Professor
Department Of Microbiology & Immunology
School Of Medicine
University Of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC  27599-7295

Steinman, Ralph M., MD
Professor
Laboratory Of Cell Physiology & Immunology
The Rockefeller University
New York, NY  10021  

Wechsberg, Wendee, M., PhD
Director, Substance Abuse, Experimental Evaluation & Interventions
Center For Interdisciplinary Substance Abuse Research
Research Triangle Institute International
Research Triangle Park, NC  27709

Wigdahl, Brian, L., PhD
Professor
Department Of Microbiology & Immunology
Hershey Medical Center
Pennsylvania State University
Hershey, PA  17033

Designated Federal Official
Elliot Postow, PhD
Director, DCPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20872


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Behavioral and Biobehavioral Processes (BBBP)  Working Group

Chairperson
Tager-Flusberg, Helen B., PhD
Professor
Department of Psychology
University of Massachusetts
Boston, MA  02125-3393

Ad Hoc
Cornblatt, Barbara Ann, PhD
Professor
Psychiatry Research
Hillside Hospital
Glen Oaks, NY  11004

Kiecolt-Glaser, Janice K., PhD
Professor
Department Of Psychiatry
Division Of Health Psychology
College Of Medicine
Ohio State University
Columbus, OH  43210

Landry, Susan H., PhD
Associate Professor
Department Of Pediatrics
University Of Texas Health Science Center
Houston, TX  77030

McClean, Michael D., PhD
Speech Scientist
Army Audiology & Speech Center
Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC)
Washington, DC  20307

Morrison, Frederick J., PhD
Professor
Department Of Psychology
Loyola University, Chicago
Chicago, IL  60626

Pacifici, Caesar, PhD
Director Of Research
Northwest Media, Inc.
Eugene, OR  97401

Woolverton, William L., PhD
Professor
Department Of Psychiatry & Human Behavior
University Of Mississippi Medical Center
Jackson, MS  39216

Designated Federal Official
Postow, Elliot, PhD
Director, DCPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD  20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Biochemical Sciences (BCS) Working Group

Chairperson    
Bond, Judith S., PhD     
Professor and Chair    
Department Of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Pennsylvania State University, College Of Medicine
Hershey, PA 17033?0850

Members         
Davis, Pamela B., MD, PhD     
Professor Of Pediatrics         
Department Of Pediatrics
Case Western Reserve University         
School Of Medicine          
Cleveland, OH 44106

Etzler, Marilynn E., PhD
Professor Of Biochemistry
Department Of Biochemistry & Biophysics
College Of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences
University Of California, Davis
Davis, CA 95616

Frey, Perry A., PhD
Professor
Department Of Biochemistry
Institute For Enzyme Research
University Of Wisconsin
Madison, Wl 53705?4087

Hook, Magnus A., PhD
Director
Center For Extracellular Matrix Biology
Institute Of Bioscience & Technology
Texas A & M University
Houston, TX 77030

Hurwitz, Jerard, PhD
Professor and Chairman
Department Of Molecular Biology
Sloan-Kettering Institute for Cancer Research
New York, NY 10021

Klebe, Robert J., PhD
Professor
Department Of Cellular and Structural Biology
University Of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, TX 78284

Leslie, Christina C., PhD
Senior Faculty Member
Department Of Pediatrics
National Jewish Center
Immunology and Respiratory Medicine
Denver, CO 80206

Scientific Review Administrator
Bengali, Zakir, PhD
Chief, BCS Integrated Review Group
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD  20892

Designated Federal Official
Schneider, Donald L., PhD
Director, DMCM
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Biophysical and Chemical Sciences (BPC) Working Group

Chairperson
Prendergast, Franklyn G., PhD, MD
Professor
Department Of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics
Mayo Foundation
Rochester, MN 55905-3008

Members
Anderson, Paul S., PhD
Senior Vice President
Division Of Chemical & Physical Sciences
Dupont Pharmaceuticals Company
Experimental Station
Wilmington, DE 19880-0500

Beattie, Diana S., PhD
Professor and Chair
Department Of Biochemistry
West Virginia University
Morgantown, WV 26506-9142

Chiu, Wah, PhD
Professor
Department Of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Baylor College Of Medicine
Houston, TX 77030

Gray, Harry B., PhD
Arnold O. Beckman Professor
Department Of Chemistry
California Institute Of Technology
Pasadena, CA 91125

Katzenellenbogen, John A., PhD
Professor Of Chemistry
Department Of Chemistry
School Of Chemical Sciences
University Of Illinois
Urbana, IL 61801

Kenyon, George L., PhD
Dean and Tom D. Rowe Professor of Pharmaceutical Chemistry
College Of Pharmacy
University Of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Ml 48109-1065

Mckay, David B., PhD
Professor
Department Of Structure Biology
Stanford University School Of Medicine
Stanford, CA 94305

Olson, Wilmak, PhD
Professor
Department Of Chemistry
Rutgers University
New Brunswick, NJ 08903

Winge, Dennis R., PhD
Professor
Department Of Biochemistry & Medicine
School Of Medicine
University Of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT 84132

Scientific Review Administrator
Schneider, Donald L., PhD
Director, DMCM
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Brain Disorders and Clinical Neuroscience (BDCN) Working Group

Chairman
Traystman, Richard J., PhD
Distinguished University Professor
Senior Vice-Chairman
Department Of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine
Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine
Baltimore, MD 21287

Members
Basbaum, Alan T., PhD
Professor and Chairman
Department Of Anatomy
University Of California, San Francisco
School Of Medicine
San Francisco, CA 94143

Berrettini, Wade H., MD, PhD
Professor
Department Of Psychiatry
University Of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Chesselet, Marie-Francoise S., MD, PhD
Professor
Department Of Neurology
UCLA School Of Medicine
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1769

Lewis, Mark H., PhD
Professor
Department Of Psychiatry
University Of Florida Health Science Center
Gainsville, FL 32610-0256

Pandey, Ghanshyam N., PhD
Professor
The Psychiatric Institute
University Of Illinois
Chicago, IL 60612-4397

Ransohoff, Richard M., MD
Professor
Department Of Neurosciences
The Lerner Research Institute
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, OH 44195-5178

Shelanski, Michael L., MD, PhD
Professor and Chairman
Department Of Pathology and Taub Institute For Research
Columbia University
New York, NY 10032

Zivin, Justin, MD, PhD
Professor
Department Of Neurosciences
University Of California, San Diego
La Jolla, CA 92093-0624

Designated Federal Official
Elliot Postow, PhD
Director, DCPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] | Roster List


Cell Development and Function (CDF) Working Group

Chairperson
Schekman, Randy, PhD
Professor
HHMI Investigator
Department Of Molecular & Cell Biology
University Of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720-3202

Members
Ebner, Timothy J., MD, PhD
Professor
Department Of Neuroscience
University Of Minnesota
Minneapolis, MN 55455

Emerson, Charles P. Jr., PhD
Professor and Chair
Department Of Cell & Developmental Biology
University Of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Philadelphia, PA 19103-6058
Epstein, Henry F., MD
Professor
Department Of Neurology
Baylor College Of Medicine
Houston, TX 77030

Graves, Barbara J., PhD
Professor and Chair
Huntsman Cancer Institute
University Of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT 84112.

Malhotra, Vivek, PhD
Professor
Department Of Biology
School Of Medicine
University Of California, San Diego
La Jolla, CA 92093-0347

Marzluff, William F. Jr., PhD
Professor and Chairman
Program In Molecular Biology & Biotechnology
University Of North Carolina School Of Medicine
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-4100

Shuttleworth, Trevor J., PhD
Professor
Department Of Pharmacology
University Of Rochester
School Of Medicine & Dentistry
Rochester, NY 14642

Simpson, Robert T., PhD
Professor
Department Of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA 16802

Zahniser, David J., PhD
Vice President For Scientific Affairs
CYTYC Corporation
85 Swanson Road
Boxborough, MA 01719

Scientific Review Administrator
Steinberg, Marcia, PhD
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892

Designated Federal Official
Schneider, Donald L., PhD
Director, DMCM
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Cardiovascular Sciences (CVS) Working Group

Chairperson
Coller, Barry S., MD
Professor
Hematology Society
Mount Sinai, New York
State University Of New York
New York, NY 10128

Members
Ferrario, Carlos M., MD
Director
Hypertension and Vascular Disease Center
Wake Forest University
Bowman Gray School Of Medicine
Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1032

Handin, Robert I., MD
Chief, Hematology
Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, MA 02115

Heistad, Donald D., MD
Director, Division Of Cardiology
Department Of Internal Medicine
University Of Iowa College Of Medicine
Iowa City, IA 52242

Lau, Serrine S., PhD
Professor
Department Of Pharmacology &  Toxicology
College Of Pharmacy
University Of Texas at Austin
Austin, TX 78712-1074

Mann, Kenneth G
Professor and Chairman
Department Of Biochemistry
College Of Medicine
University Of Vermont
Burlington, VT 05405

Nath, Karl A., MBCH, MD
Professor
Department Of Internal Medicine
Division Of Nephrology
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, MN 55905

Robbins, Jeffrey, PhD
Professor
Department Of Pediatrics
Division Of Molecular Cardiovascular Biology
University Of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, OH 45229

Roden, Dan M., MD
Professor Of Medicine & Pharmacology
Vanderbilt University
School Of Medicine
Nashville, TN 55905

Designated Federal Official
Martin, Michael R., PhD
Director, DPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] | Roster List


Endocrinology And Reproductive (ENR) Sciences & Nutritional And Metabolic Sciences (NMS) Working Group

Chairperson
Keen, Carl L., PhD
Professor and Chair
Department Of Nutrition
University Of California, Davis
Davis, CA 95616

Corkey, Barbara E., MD
Professor
Department Of Medicine
Obesity Research Center
Boston University
Boston, MA 02118

Franklin, Renty B., PhD
Professor
Department Of OCBS/Molecular & Cell Biology
University Of Maryland Dental School
Baltimore, MD 21201

Gishan, Fayez K., MD
Professor and Chair
Department Of Pediatrics
School Of Medicine
University Of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85724

Gregory, Jesse F., PhD
Professor
Department Of Food Science & Human Nutrition
Institute Of Food & Agricultural Sciences
University Of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-0370

Howard, Barbara V., PhD
President
Medlantic Research Institute
Hyman 242
Washington, DC 20010-2933

Nilson, John H., PhD 
John H. Hord Professor and Chair
Department Of Pharmacology
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, OH 44106-4965

Designated Federal Official
Martin, Michael R., PhD
Director. DPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Genetic Sciences (GNS) Working Group

Chairperson
Beaudet, Arthur L., MD
Professor and Chairman
Department Of Molecular & Human Genetics
Baylor College Of Medicine
Houston, TX  77030

Members
Fields, Stanley H., PhD
HHMI Investigator and Professor
Department Of Genetics
University Of Washington
Seattle, WA 98195

Hittelman, Walter N., PhD
Professor Of Medicine
Department Of Clinical Investigation
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX 77030

Hobbs, Helen H., MD
Professor
Department Of Molecular Genetics
Graduate School Of Biomedical Sciences
University Of Texas SW Medical Center
Dallas, TX 75235

Mackay, Trudy F., PhD
Professor
Department Of Genetics
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27695-7614

Snyder, Michael P., PhD
Professor and Chairman
Department Of Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology
Yale University
New Haven, CT 06520-8103

Scientific Review Administrator
Pearson, Nancy, PhD
Chief, GNS Integrated Review Group
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of HealthI
Bethesda, MD 20892|

Designated Federal Official
Schneider, Donald L., PhD
Director. DMCM
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (IDM) Working Group

Chairperson
Iglewski, Barbara H., PhD
Professor
Department Of Microbiology & Immunology
University Of Rochester        
Rochester, NY 14642

Ad Hoc
Holmes, Kathryn V., PhD
Professor
Department Of Microbiology
Health Science Center
University Of Colorado
Denver, CO  80262

Laimins, Laimonis A., PhD
Associate Professor
Department Of Microbiology & Immunology
School Of Medicine
Northwestern University         
Chicago, IL 60611

Ludden, Paul W., PhD
Professor
Department Of Biochemistry
College Of Agriculture & Life Sciences
University Of Wisconsin
Madison, Wl 53706

Lutkenhaus, Joseph F., PhD
Professor
Department Of Microbiology
University Of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, KS 66160-0001

Reeve, John N., PhD
Professor
Department Of Microbiology
Ohio State University
Columbus, OH 43210-1292

Schmid, Molly B., PhD
Senior Director Of Functional Genomics
Genencor International
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1013

Squires, Catherine L., PhD
Professor
Department of Molecular Biology & Microbiology
Tufts University School Of Medicine
Boston, MA 02111

Tanowitz, Herbert B., MD
Professor
Department Of Pathology
Albert Einstein College Of Medicine
Bronx, NY 10461

Weinstock, George M., PhD
Professor and Co-Director
Human Genome Sequencing Center
Baylor College Of Medicine
Houston, TX 77030

Whaley, Kevin J., PhD
Director
Antibody Discovery
Epicyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
San Diego, CA 92121

Scientific Review Administrator
Schneider, Donald L., PhD
Director. DMCM
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892

Grants Technical Assistant
Shifflett, Virginia
Administrative Review Assistant
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Integrative, Functional & Cognitive Neurosciences (IFCN) Working Group

Chairperson
Koob, George F., PhD
Professor
Department Of Neuropharmacology
Division Of Psychopharmacology
The Scripps Research Institute
La Jolla, CA 92037

Members
Dubocovich, Margarita L., PhD
Professor
Department Of Molecular Pharmacology & Biological Chemistry
Northwestern University Medical School
Chicago, IL 60611

Lee, Nancy M., PhD
Senior Scientist
Geraldine Brush Cancer Research Institute
California-Pacific Medical Center
Research Institute
San Francisco, CA 94115

Manis, Paul B., PhD
Professor
Division Of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
Department Of Surgery
University Of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, NC 27599

Marder, Eve E., PhD
Professor
Department Of Biology
Brandeis Unveristy
Waltham, MA 02254

Maunsell, John H., PhD
Professor
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Baylor College Of Medicine
Division Of Neuroscience
Houston, TX 77030

Mendell, Lorne M., PhD
Professor
Department Of Neurobiology and Behavior
SUNY at Stony Brook
Stony Brook, NY 11794-5230

Paige, Gary D., PhD, MD
Professor and Chair
Department Of Neurobiology & Anatomy
University Of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, NY 14642

Victor, Jonathan D., MD, PhD
Professor
Department Of Neurology and Neuroscience
Weill Medical College Of Cornell University
New York, NY 10021

Zucker, Irving H., PhD
Professor
Department Of Psychology
College Of Letters & Science
University Of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720

Designated Federal Official
Martin, Michael R., PhD 
Director, DPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Immunological Sciences (IMM) Working Group

Chairperson    
Marrack, Philippa C., PhD
Professor
Department Of Immunology
National Jewish Medical & Research Center
1400 Jackson Street
Denver, CO 80206  

Members         
Biron, Christine A., PhD
Professor and Chair    
Department Of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology      
Brown University
Providence, Rl 02912  

Birshtein, Barbara, PhD    
Professor         
Department Of Cell Biology
Albert Einstein College Of Medicine
Bronx, NY 10461  

Braciale, Thomas J., PhD, MD
Director and Professor         
Beirne B. Carter Center Of Immunology Research
University Of Virginia Health Systems
Charlottesville, VA 22908

Busse, William W., MD
Professor Of Medicine
Head, Allergy & Immunology
University Of Wisconsin Medical School
600 Highland Ave, H6/360
Madison, Wl 53792-3244

Djeu, Julie Y., PhD
Program Leader, Immunology Program
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
University Of South Florida
12902 Magnolia Drive
Tampa, FL 33612

Hammerling, Ulrich G., PhD
Member, Immunology Program
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
1275 York Avenue
New York, NY 10021

Oliver, Janet M., PhD
Professor
Department Of Pathology and Cancer Center
University Of New Mexico School Of Medicine
2325 Camino de Salud, CRF 201
Albuquerque, NM 87131

Wei, Weizen, PhD
Associate Professor
Department Of Immunology
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Wayne State University
110 East Warren Avenue
Detroit, MI 48201

Scientific Review Administrator
Laing, Calberta, PhD
Chief, IMM Integrated Review Group
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892

Other Review Staff
Schneider, Donald L., PhD
Director. DMCM
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Molecular, Cellular, & Developmental Neuroscience (MDCN) Working Group

Chairperson    
Reichardt, Louis F., PhD
Professor         
Department Of Physiology
School Of Medicine          
University Of California
San Francisco, CA 94143-0723

Members         
Bezanilla, Francisco J., PhD
Professor
Department Of Physiology
University Of California
Los Angeles, CA 90095
Federoff, Howard J., MD, PhD     
Professor and Director
Department Of Neurology
Institute Of Biomedical Sciences
Center On Aging & Developmental Biology
University Of Rochester School Of Medicine          
Rochester, NY 14642

Hall, Jeffrey C., PhD     
Professor         
Department Of Biology
College Of Arts and Sciences   
Brandeis University
Waltham, MA 02454

Kaufman, Paul L., MD
Professor
Department Of Ophthalmology
Medical School 
University Of Wisconsin        
Madison, WI  53706

Lee, Virginia M., MD, PhD
Professor
Department Of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
University Of Pennsylvania School Of Medicine          
3600 Spruce St., Maloney 3rd Fl.
Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283

Raine, Cedric S., PhD
Professor
Department Of Pathology/Neurology
Albert Einstein College Of Medicine
1300 Morris Park Avenue
Bronx, NY 10461

Raymond, Pamela A., PhD
Professor
Department Of Cell & Developmental Biology
University Of Michigan School Of Medicine
4610 Medical Science II, Bldg. 0616
Ann Arbor, MI 8109-1340

Schor, Nina F., MD, PhD
Professor
Department Of Pediatrics, Neurology & Pharmacology
University Of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Westbrook, Gary L., MD
Senior Scientist and Associate Professor
Department Of Neurology
Medical School
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, OR 97201

Wilkins, Diana G., PhD
Assistant Director
Center For Human Toxicology
University Of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT 84108

Wilson, Steven E., MD
Professor
Department Of Ophthalmology
University Of Washington
Seattle, WA 98195

Scientific Review Administrator
Jelsema, Carole L., PhD
Chief, MDCN Integrated Review Group
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892

Other Review Staff
Schneider, Donald L., PhD
Director. DMCM
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Musculoskeletal & Dental Sciences (MSD) Working Group

Chairperson
Hruska, Keith A., MD
Professor Of Medicine, Renal Division
Barnes-Jewish Hospital at Washington
University Medical Center
St. Louis, MO 63110

Members
Boskey, Adele L., PhD
Professor Of Biochemistry and Cell Biology & Anatomy
Cornell University Medical College
Hospital For Special Surgery
New York, NY 10021

Cunha, Gerald R., PhD
Associate Professor
Department Of Anatomy
University Of California-San Francisco
San Francisco, CA 94143

Ershler, William B., MD
Director
Institute For Advanced Studies In Aging & Geriatric Medicine
Washington, DC 20006

Mitch, William E., MD
Professor and Director
Department Of Medicine
Division Of Nephrology
School Of Medicine
Emory University
Atlanta, GA 30322

Peckham, Paul H., PhD
Professor
Department Of Biomedical Engineering
Director, FES Center
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, OH 44109

Rosier, Randy N., MD, PhD
Professor
Department Of Orthopedic Surgery
University Of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, NY 14642

Stohler, Christian S., DDS, PhD
Professor and Chair
Department Of Biological & Material Science
Director Of Research
University Of Michigan School Of Dentistry
Ann Arbor, Mi 48109-1028

Stricklin, George P., MD, PhD
Professor
Department Of Dermatology
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, TN 37212

Designated Federal Official
Martin, Michael R., PhD
Director, DPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Oncological Sciences (ONC) Working Group

Chairperson
Kripke, Margaret L., PhD
Vice President Of Cancer Research
University Of Texas
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX 77030

Members
Augenlicht, Leonard H., PhD
Professor
Department Of Oncology
Albert Einstein Cancer Center
Montefiore Medical Center
Bronx, NY 10467

Doroshow, James H., MD
Director
Department Of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research
City Of Hope Cancer Research Center
Duarte, CA 91010

Fernandes, Daniel J., PhD
Professor
Medical University Of South Carolina
Hollings Cancer Center
Charleston, SC 29425

Furmanski, Philip, PhD
Professor and Chairman
Department Of Biology
School Of Medicine
New York University
New York, NY 10003

Ling, Clifton C., PhD
Chairman
Department Of Medical Physics
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, NY 10021

Shu, Suyu C, PhD
Director
Center For Surgery Research
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, OH 44195

Scientific Review Administrator
Postow, Elliot, PhD
Director, DCPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] | Roster List


Pathophysiological Sciences (PPS) Working Group

Chairperson
Goyal, Raj K., MD
Professor Of Medicine, Research and Development
VA Medical Center
Harvard Medical School
West Roxbury, MA 02132

Ad Hoc
Baldwin, Kenneth M., PhD
Professor
University Of California, Irvine
Department Of Physiology & Biophysics
College Of Medicine
Irvine, CA 92697-4560

Hines, Ronald N., PhD
Professor and Co-Director
Department Of Pediatrics/Birth Defects Center
Medical College Of Wisconsin and Children's Hospital
Milwaukee, WI 53226-4801

Solway, Julian, MD
Professor
Department Of Medicine
University Of Chicago
Chicago, IL 60637

Tache, Yvette F., PhD
Professor
Department Of Medicine
School Of Medicine
University Of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1769

Ward, Peter A., MD
Professor and Chairman Of Pathology
Department Of Pathology
Medical Science I Bldg., Box 045
University Of Michigan Medical School
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0602

Designated Federal Official
Martin, Michael R., PhD
Director, DPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] | Roster List


Risk, Prevention and Health Behavior (RPHB) Working Group

Chairperson
Mccubbin, James A., PhD
Professor and Chair
Department Of Psychology
College Of Business and Behavioral Science
Clemson University
Clemson, SC 29634-1511

Members
Halverson, Charles F., PhD
Professor
Department Of Child and Family Development
University Of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602

Ruble, Diane, PhD
Professor
Department Of Psychology
New York University
New York, NY 10003

Schwartz, Marc, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department Of Oncology
Lombardi Cancer Center
Georgetown University Medical School
Washington, DC 20007

Williams, Redford B. Jr., MD
Professor Of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Professor Of Medicine
Professor Of Psychology and Director, Behavioral Medicine Research Center
Duke University
Durham, NC 27708

Designated Federal Official
Postow, Elliot, PhD
Director, DCPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Social Sciences, Nursing, Epidemiology, & Methods (SNEM) Working Group

Chairperson
Morgan, S. Philip, PhD
Professor
Department Of Sociology
Duke University
Durham, NC 27708

Ad Hoc
Buring, Julie E., DSC
Professor
Ambulatory Care and Prevention
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA 02115

Cramer, Daniel, MD
Professor
Department Of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ob-Gyn Epidemiology Center
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, MA 02115

Dickey, Barbara, PhD
Associate Professor
Department Of Psychiatry
School Of Medicine
Harvard University
Mclean Hospital
Belmont, MA 02178

Ganz, Patricia A., MD
Professor
Division Of Cancer Prevention and Control Research
UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, CA 90095

Hoffman, Leslie A., PhD, FAAN, RN
Professor and Chair
Department Of Acute/Tertiary Care
School Of Nursing
University Of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA 15261

Jerome, Albert, PhD
Research Consultant
Behavioral Research Associates, Inc.
Reston, VA 20190

Kelsey, Jennifer L., PhD
Professor
Department Of Health Research and Policy
Division Of Epidemiology
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-5405

Lasater, Thomas M., PhD
Director Of Research and Professor Of Community Health
Brown University Center For Primary Care
& Prevention
Memorial Hospital Of Rhode Island
Pawtucket, RI 02860

Lehoczky, John P., PhD
Professor
Department Of Statistics
College Of Humanities and Social Sciences
Carnegie-Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213

Tilson, Hugh A., PhD
Research Planning and Coordination Branch
US Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Designated Federal Official
Postow, Elliot, PhD
Director, DCPS
Center For Scientific Review
National Institutes Of Health
Bethesda, MD 20892


[Back to Top] [Back to Roster Index]


Surgery, Radiology, & Bioengineering (SRB) Working Group

Chairperson
Maier, Ronald V., MD
Professor Of Surgery
School Of Medicine
University Of Washington
Seattle, WA  98104

Members
Billiar, Timothy R., MD, PhD
Professor & Chair, Department Of Surgery
University Of Pittsburgh
Presbyterian University Hospital
Pittsburgh, PA  15213-2582

Evelhoch, Jeffrey L., PhD
Associate Professor
Department Of Internal Medicine/MR Center
Wayne State University/Harper Hospital
Detroit, MI  48201

Miller, D.C., MD
Professor, Cardiovascular Surgery
Stanford University School Of Medicine
Stanford, CA  04305-5247

Samsel, Richard W., MD
Vice President For Informatics
Cyberpulse, LLC.
Chicago, IL  60637

Staiano-Coico, Lisa F., PhD
Professor and Senior Associate Dean For
Research, Department Of Surgery
Weill Medical College
Cornell University
New York, NY  10021

Vannier, Michael W., MD
Professor, Department  Of Radiology
University Of Iowa
Iowa City, IA  52240

Von Ramm, Olaf T., PhD
Associate Professor
Department Of Biomedical Engineering
School Of Engineering
Duke University
Durham, NC  27706


to top