FFY 2000 CCDF Data Tables and Charts |
Index:
Cover page | List of
Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served
| 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care
by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated
| 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail
| 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer
Education | Reason for Care Chart
| Ages Chart
The entire collection of tables and charts is available
in Excel document. |
Child
Care and Development Fund
Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care (FFY 2000) |
State | Total Percent | Licensed or Regulated Providers | Providers Legally Operating Without Regulation | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | Child's Home | Family Home | Group Home | Center | |||||
Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
Relative | Non- Relative |
|||||||
Alabama | 100% | 0% | 8% | 6% | 61% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
Alaska | 100% | 0% | 10% | 2% | 43% | 2% | 3% | 12% | 28% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
American Samoa | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Arizona | 100% | 0% | 10% | 5% | 73% | 2% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Arkansas | 100% | 1% | 22% | 0% | 77% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
California | 100% | 0% | 13% | 6% | 57% | 4% | 1% | 11% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Colorado | 100% | 0% | 20% | 0% | 56% | 2% | 8% | 9% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Connecticut | 100% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 35% | 42% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Delaware | 100% | 0% | 34% | 2% | 45% | 3% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
District of Columbia | 100% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 97% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Florida | 100% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 82% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
Georgia | 100% | 0% | 9% | 2% | 80% | 0% | 1% | 2% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Guam | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 11% | 6% | 34% | 8% | 0% | 1% | 9% |
Hawaii | 100% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 13% | 5% | 3% | 45% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 21% |
Idaho | 100% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 44% | 1% | 1% | 21% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Illinois | 100% | 0% | 13% | 1% | 30% | 11% | 19% | 20% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Indiana | 100% | 0% | 19% | 0% | 20% | 3% | 2% | 17% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
Iowa | 100% | 0% | 27% | 12% | 35% | 0% | 1% | 6% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Kansas | 100% | 0% | 8% | 41% | 36% | 3% | 3% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Kentucky | 100% | 0% | 5% | 1% | 66% | 1% | 1% | 16% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Louisiana | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 64% | 6% | 13% | 1% | 16% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Maine | 100% | 0% | 35% | 0% | 42% | 3% | 5% | 4% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Maryland | 100% | 0% | 34% | 0% | 38% | 12% | 5% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Massachusetts | 100% | 0% | 7% | 16% | 62% | 4% | 6% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Michigan | 100% | 0% | 9% | 8% | 16% | 16% | 17% | 34% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Minnesota | 100% | 0% | 32% | 0% | 31% | 4% | 4% | 8% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Mississippi | 100% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 75% | 8% | 2% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Missouri | 100% | 0% | 17% | 1% | 68% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Montana | 100% | 0% | 21% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 1% | 1% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Nebraska | 100% | 0% | 25% | 11% | 41% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Nevada | 100% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 68% | 1% | 0% | 1% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 19% |
New Hampshire | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
New Jersey | 100% | 0% | 12% | 0% | 73% | 1% | 0% | 4% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
New Mexico | 100% | 0% | 2% | 5% | 41% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
New York | 100% | 0% | 12% | 5% | 30% | 7% | 10% | 15% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
North Carolina | 100% | 0% | 13% | 1% | 82% | 0% | 0% | 3% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
North Dakota | 100% | 0% | 40% | 29% | 28% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Northern Mariana Islands | 100% | 45% | 38% | 0% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Ohio | 100% | 0% | 37% | 1% | 63% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Oklahoma | 100% | 0% | 18% | 0% | 82% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Oregon | 100% | 0% | 9% | 1% | 34% | 3% | 8% | 10% | 32% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
Pennsylvania | 100% | 0% | 6% | 3% | 49% | 3% | 4% | 8% | 26% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Puerto Rico | 100% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 52% | 1% | 0% | 22% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Rhode Island | 100% | 0% | 16% | 0% | 64% | 3% | 5% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
South Carolina | 100% | 0% | 5% | 3% | 77% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
South Dakota | 100% | 0% | 41% | 9% | 31% | 2% | 1% | 12% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Tennessee | 100% | 0% | 7% | 5% | 75% | 1% | 0% | 2% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Texas | 100% | 0% | 3% | 3% | 76% | 7% | 0% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Utah | 100% | 0% | 10% | 4% | 32% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 30% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Vermont | 100% | 0% | 43% | 0% | 39% | 1% | 5% | 1% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Virgin Islands | 100% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 74% | 1% | 0% | 4% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
Virginia | 100% | 0% | 26% | 0% | 58% | 1% | 0% | 10% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Washington | 100% | 0% | 26% | 0% | 40% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
West Virginia | 100% | 0% | 46% | 2% | 46% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Wisconsin | 100% | 0% | 37% | 0% | 63% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Wyoming | 100% | 0% | 7% | 14% | 30% | 9% | 5% | 15% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
National | 100% | 0% | 14% | 3% | 57% | 4% | 4% | 9% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
Notes:
1. | The source for this data is ACF-800 data from FFY 2000. |
2. | New Hampshire did not report number of children by setting type. |
3. | A "0%" indication often means the value is less than 0.5% rather than actually zero. |
4. | In a few instances, the sum of the categories may not appear to add up to exactly 100% because of rounding. |
Index: Cover page | List of Tables and Charts | 1-Children Served | 2-Type of Payment | 3-Care by Type | 4-Regulated vs. Non-Regulated | 5-Relative Care | 6-Setting Detail | 7-Provider Summary | 8-Consumer Education | Reason for Care Chart | Ages Chart |