Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      


The Child Care Bureau   Advanced
Search


FFY 2006 CCDF Data Tables (Final Data, July 2008)

Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income
The entire collection of tables is also available in Excel or PDF format.

Table 1
Average Monthly Adjusted Number of Families and Children Served (FFY 2006)
States/Territories Average Number
of Families
Average Number
of Children
Alabama 14,700 28,000
Alaska 2,900 4,900
American Samoa  -   - 
Arizona 18,100 30,200
Arkansas 3,900 5,600
California 111,500 175,500
Colorado 8,900 16,300
Connecticut 6,300 10,100
Delaware 4,600 7,500
District of Columbia 2,600 3,700
Florida 67,900 108,600
Georgia 35,600 64,600
Guam 300 600
Hawaii 5,600 8,600
Idaho 5,400 9,900
Illinois 44,500 82,200
Indiana 17,300 32,800
Iowa 11,100 19,400
Kansas 12,000 22,400
Kentucky 16,200 28,900
Louisiana 23,200 39,100
Maine 3,700 5,400
Maryland 13,500 22,900
Massachusetts 23,900 32,100
Michigan 45,000 87,800
Minnesota 15,100 27,300
Mississippi 19,500 39,100
Missouri 19,200 33,600
Montana 2,900 4,800
Nebraska 7,400 13,100
Nevada 3,600 6,000
New Hampshire 5,100 7,500
New Jersey 26,000 37,900
New Mexico 12,700 21,600
New York 73,200 123,700
North Carolina 39,300 79,900
North Dakota 2,500 4,000
Northern Mariana Islands 200 400
Ohio 28,800 39,900
Oklahoma 14,600 25,000
Oregon 11,000 20,200
Pennsylvania 47,300 82,800
Puerto Rico 7,800 10,700
Rhode Island 4,400 7,100
South Carolina 11,300 19,700
South Dakota 3,100 4,900
Tennessee 22,200 42,500
Texas 68,200 126,200
Utah 7,000 13,000
Vermont 4,700 6,800
Virgin Islands 400 700
Virginia 17,200 27,900
Washington 32,700 53,200
West Virginia 5,600 9,300
Wisconsin 16,800 29,500
Wyoming 2,900 4,700
National Total 1,025,400 1,770,100
Notes applicable to this table:
1. The source for this table is ACF-801 data for FFY 2006.
2. All counts are "adjusted" numbers of families and children unless otherwise indicated. These "adjusted" numbers represent the number funded through CCDF only. The "adjusted" number is the raw or "unadjusted" number reported by the State multiplied by the pooling factor as reported on the ACF-800. DC has indicated that the pooling factor reported on the ACF-800 is not applicable to the ACF-801. This report takes this factor into consideration in calculating the "adjusted" numbers or percentages.
3. All States provide an actual unadjusted count of families served each month. For States reporting full population data, the number of child records reported each month were directly counted. However, for States that only submit samples, the ratio of children-to-families was determined each month from the samples and then multiplied by the reported number of families to obtain an estimate of the unadjusted number of children served each month. The unadjusted average number of families and children were obtained from the monthly numbers in the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY).
4. At the time of publication, American Samoa had not reported any ACF-801 data for FFY 2006 and Guam had only submitted ten (10) months of data.
5. Connecticut does not report ACF-801 data on all or nearly all children served by contracted centers. Alaska's reported population does not accurately reflect the population served from October 2005 through January 2006 by CCDF due to sampling difficulties. However, Alaska began reporting full population data in February 2006. Alaska does not report any children in foster care or families headed by a child.
6. The reported results shown above have been rounded to the nearest 100. The national numbers are simply the sum of the State and Territory numbers.
Index: 1-Average Monthly Families and Children Served | 2-Percent of Children Served by Payment Method | 3-Percent of Children Served by Types of Care | 4-Percent of Children Served in Regulated Settings vs. Settings Legally Operating without Regulation | 5-Percent Served by Relatives vs. Non-Relatives | 6-Percent of Children Served in All Types of Care | 7-Number of Child Care Providers Receiving CCDF Funds | 8-Methods of Consumer Education Summary | 9-Children Served by Age Group | 10-Children Served by Reason for Care | 11-Children by Racial Group | 12-Children by Latino Ethnicity | 13-Care by Age Category and Type of Care | 14-Care By Age Group and Care Type | 15-Expenditures By Age Group and Care Type | 16-TANF as a Source of Income | 17-Co-payment as a Percent of Family Income