Your browser does not support CSS and therefor you are seeing
a plain, functional page rather than the modern, designed site. The site is
fully functional this way, just not as nice to look at. To see this site as it
was intended, please upgrade to a modern browser like
Mozilla Firefox,
Opera,
Netscape (7 or higher) or Internet
Explorer (6 or higher).
Search General Jurisdiction
| 12/03/2008 | Allegra | LUBLIN CORPORATION, t/a CENTURY 21, ADVANTAGE GOLD v. THE UNITED STATES (07-206C) | Contract case; Motion to dismiss under RCFC 12; Alleged breach of oral contract; Applicability of Contract Disputes Act;Oral contract was not for the “procurement of services” within the meaning of 41 U.S.C. § 602(a); Definition of term... |
| 11/26/2008 | Sweeney | WEST BAY BUILDERS, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, (04-1140C) | RCFC 56; Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment; Contract Interpretation; Patent and Latent Ambiguities; Doctrine of Contra Proferentem |
| 11/26/2008 | Damich | CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES (02-1894C) | Motion for summary judgment; RCFC 56;28 U.S.C. § 2516; interest;attorney and expert fees |
| 11/25/2008 | Hewitt | ALPHA I, L.P., BY AND THROUGH ROBERT SANDS, A NOTICE PARTNER v. THE UNITED STATES (06-407T) | Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; RCFC 56; 26 U.S.C.§ 6662 |
| 11/25/2008 | Horn | ENGLEWOOD TERRACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Michigan Limited Partnership v. UNITED STATES (03-2209C) | Owner Claims for Rent Increase and Energy Reimbursement in HUD Public Housing Program |
| 11/25/2008 | Sweeney | BLR GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. v. USA (07-579C) | RCFC 12(b)(1); Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613; Performance Evaluation; Definition of Claim;Nonmonetary Relief; “Jurisdictional Parity” with Boards of Contract Appeals; Contracting Officer’s Final Decision;Deemed Denial |
| 11/24/2008 | Bush | STEPHEN BOYER, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES (00-641C) | Overtime Pay; Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000); Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. §§ 251-62 (2000); Home to Work Travel Time; RCFC 12(c); Controlling Precedent |
| 11/24/2008 | Bush | CHRISTOPHER M. WOLFEN v. THE UNITED STATES (03-2665C) | Overtime Pay; Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000); Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. §§ 251-62 (2000); Home to Work Travel Time; RCFC 12(c);Controlling Precedent |
| 11/24/2008 | Bush | THEODORE C. ANTONSEN, et. al., v. THE UNITED STATES (04-163C) | Overtime Pay; Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000); Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. §§ 251-62 (2000); Home to Work Travel Time; RCFC 12(c); Controlling Precedent |
| 11/21/2008 | Futey | FEDERAL AIR MARSHALS (FAM) FAM 1 ET AL., v. THE UNITED STATES (06-233C) | Applicability of the FLSA,29 FAM 1 ET AL.,U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2008);Law of the Case Doctrine;Section 7 of the FLSA; “In Law Enforcement Activities”; Section 207 (k) “Work Period”;Availability Pay; Overtime Premiums |
Printer-friendly version of this page