> -----Original Message-----
> From: Subject Coordinates Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Joe Aufmuth
> Sent: 03 July, 2006 09:43
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [SUBCOOR] The proposal passed MARBI!
>
> If we're going to use GPS for authority records, what level
> of accuracy will be acceptable? Will there be a standardized
> method of collection? Typical handheld "walmart" receivers
> greatly vary in their measurements. Elevations in particular
> can be quite poor. So, who will be generating the authority
> records and the subsequent coordinates and elevations?
> Surveyors? GNIS? NGA? Catalogers? Who will be testing the
> accuracy of the coordinates used?
The question is how important *is* accuracy? That handheld
Wal-Mart receiver might be +/- 30 meters and a surveyor's unit
in the centimeters range. Does that really make a difference
when a patron wants to know the general vicinity someplace is?
Now, these coordinates could be used for other purposes, where
accuracy might be an issue. However, lets say there is a local
place of historical significance to your community. It doesn't
appear in any GNIS database. So are you going to pay a surveyor
several hundred dollars to give you the coordinates or are you
just going to send someone to the place with a handheld unit to
take measurements?
Certainly the answer to that question depends on a number of
factors. The format should provide information on the collection
method. When a more accurate method is available, then certainly
it would be best to record that information or update the originally
collected information.
The point being, the format shouldn't dictate one collection method
over another, but provide a place to record the type of collection
method in addition to the actual coordinates. [in a separate subfield
from the coordinates, please, which will make machine processing and
indexing easier]
