[DNFSB
LETTERHEAD]
August
6, 2004
The
Honorable Linton Brooks
Administrator
National
Nuclear Security Administration
U.S.
Department of Energy
1000
Independence Avenue, SW
Washington,
DC 20585-0701
Dear
Ambassador Brooks:
The
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) sent two letters to you and
your staff, dated April 4, 2003, and July 9, 2003, regarding the status of
training and qualification programs at National Nuclear Security Administration
(NNSA) sites. The response from the Deputy
Administrator for Defense Programs, dated October 2, 2003, acknowledged that
several site offices—at Los Alamos
National Laboratory (LANL), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), and
the Nevada Test Site (NTS)—lacked
compliant training and qualification programs, and therefore could not validate
the adequacy of their contractor’s training and qualification programs. The Nevada Site Office (NSO), in particular,
was “in the process of implementing procedures and processes for nuclear work
including training. NSO indicated that
they will be in compliance with [Department of Energy Order] 5480.20A in the Device
Assembly Facility by the end of 2003, and for the subcritical experiments by
the end of 2004.”
In
an update on April 27, 2004, the Deputy Administrator reported that the Device Assembly
Facility training evaluation, scheduled for October 2003, had slipped to May
2004. NSO made the commitment that, even
if the schedule changed again, the training evaluation would be completed no
later than June 1, 2004.
The
Board has learned that high level evaluations conducted by the Los Alamos Site Office
(LASO) during the past several months at LANL have uncovered significant
deficiencies in training and qualification, and that further evaluations are
required to fully understand the issues involved. The Deputy Administrator informed the Board in
a letter dated June 4, 2004, that the LLNL evaluation has been delayed until
August 6, 2004. A similar letter dated
July 15, 2004, stated that the NTS training evaluation will be delayed until
late August 2004. Further, instead of
performing a dedicated evaluation, NSO intends to conduct the training and qualification
evaluation as part of an Operational Readiness Review.
The
Board finds this situation unacceptable. NNSA’s senior managers have been aware of this
situation for more than a year, yet, with the exception of LASO, efforts to
begin defining the boundaries of the problem are only now being initiated. Corrective actions, contingent upon completion
of the evaluations, have been inexcusably delayed at all three sites. The need for more immediate action on this
issue is evident. Examples include the
inadequacies in the training and qualifications of personnel conducting the
Armando subcritical experiment, identified during the NNSA Readiness
Assessment, and the results of the high level training evaluations at LANL.
Therefore,
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2286b(d), the Board requests that, within 45 days of receipt
of this letter, NNSA provide the results of thorough, site
wide evaluations of the training and qualification programs at LANL, LLNL, and
NTS in accordance with DOE Standard 1070-94. Further, the Board requests that
within 30 days of completion of these evaluations, NNSA representatives brief
the Board on the corrective action plans designed to address any findings.
Sincerely,
John
T. Conway
Chairman
c: The Honorable
Everet H. Beckner
Mr. Mark B. Whitaker, Jr.