Voter Registration Drives in the Workplace(2)
Mr. _____________
Re: OSC File No. AD-04-xxxx
Dear Mr. __________:
This letter is a follow-up to an advisory opinion the
Office of Special Counsel (OSC) issued you on April 14, 2004, and in
response to several federal agencies’ requests for advisory opinions
concerning AFGE’s desire to conduct voter registration drives in the
workplace. In the April 14 opinion, we advised that the Hatch Act would
prohibit a federal employee, while on duty or in his or her workplace, from
participating in a partisan voter registration drive. In addition, we gave
general guidance regarding some factors that OSC considers in determining
whether a voter registration drive is partisan.
Since issuing that opinion, we have learned of AFGE’s
plans to conduct voter registration drives in various agencies across the
country. We also now have more information regarding AFGE’s political
activities. We understand that at this time, AFGE has not endorsed a
candidate in the 2004 Presidential election.1 However, since at least the
election of 1984,2 AFGE has endorsed partisan candidates in federal
elections, including Presidential elections. Thus, over the years AFGE has
become identified with the success or failure of candidates in partisan
elections. The evidence we have obtained, as explained further below, has
led us to conclude that, in the current election cycle, AFGE has become
identified publicly and repeatedly with the failure of a Presidential
candidate, namely, George W. Bush. Therefore, we have concluded, as we did
in 1984, that AFGE is unable to conduct a truly nonpartisan voter
registration drive. As such, the Hatch Act would prohibit federal employees,
while on duty or in their workplace, from participating in a voter
registration drive conducted by AFGE.
The information we have gathered from AFGE’s website
supports the conclusion stated above. For example, there is information
posted under the heading “Election 2004” about AFGE’s 2004 Media Campaign
and the two ads it is currently running in South Carolina. Both ads are
critical of the Bush Administration on the issues of privatization within
the Veteran’s Administration and government contracts awarded to certain
corporations. One ad states, “And when contractors go over budget or commit
fraud? It seems as long as [big corporations] keep writing bit [sic]
contribution checks to the Bush Campaign, they just keep getting more
government contracts.” In addition, posted under this same heading is the
statement, “Come back soon for more information on the 2004 Media Campaign
and AFGE’s efforts to impact the outcome of the presidential race.”
Also posted on AFGE’s website is its publication,
The
Government Standard. In the January/February 2004 issue of this publication
is a message from AFGE National President John Gage that clearly advocates
against the current Administration. Mr. Gage makes comments about Congress
being “led by rogue Republicans,” and about “[t]he Administration’s
brass-knuckle tactics,” and states that, “[i]t is particularly disgusting
now to recall how this Administration repeatedly raised the red, white and
blue to justify their actions when, in hindsight, it has become so clear
that the only color they really care about is green.” In addition, Mr. Gage
states, “we are targeted as a big red bulls-eye by this Administration.”
These statements by Mr. Gage were made in his capacity as AFGE President and
printed in an official AFGE publication.
In the March/April 2004 issue of The Government
Standard is an article about the annual Civil, Women and Workers’ Rights
Caucus titled, “Protecting Our Rights . . . Saving Our Jobs.” The article
notes that conference participants were invited to discuss topics pertinent
to AFGE members, such as voter registration, privatization and the
elimination of collective bargaining rights, and equal employment
opportunity and civil rights. At the conference, members were encouraged to
“become active in the election process by educating and registering voters
in AFGE’s membership and in their respective agencies.” Voter education and
registration was also emphasized as playing a role in combating alleged
threats by the Bush Administration. The article stresses that “this is a
time to rally together against the Bush Administration and, moreover, unite
under the common thread of AFGE membership.”
This article, as well as other postings on AFGE’s
website, demonstrates not only that AFGE is dissatisfied with the current
Administration, but goes further to encourage that efforts of AFGE members
should be directed at the Administration’s removal. In addition, its website
makes it clear that AFGE plans to become involved in and make an impact on
the 2004 Presidential election and that voter registration is an important
tool in advancing that goal.
OSC has also received information about activities of
AFGE regional and local representatives which indicates that AFGE has become
identified with the failure of Presidential candidate George W. Bush.
Currently, OSC is investigating three AFGE officials for allegedly engaging
in political activity while on duty and/or in a federal workplace. One
official circulated throughout a federal office an AFGE regional newsletter
that stated, “Protect yourself and your country: Vote George Bush out of
office!”
In a second case, we have obtained evidence that
another AFGE official explicitly advocated Mr. Bush’s defeat by making
statements to federal employees at a new employee orientation program, such
as, “the only way to stop this administration and keep government employees’
jobs safe is to vote Democratic in the upcoming election.” Lastly, we are
investigating an AFGE official who sent an e-mail purporting to be President
George W. Bush’s resume to over seventy individuals. The document sets
forth, in resume format, President Bush’s education, work experience, and
“accomplishments” as Governor of Texas and as President, and other matters
relating to his career. The document is filled with allegations of
incompetence and malfeasance and is clearly directed at Mr. Bush’s defeat in
the upcoming election. At the end of the document, the following statement
is flashing: “Please send this to every voter you know.”
Thus, based on the complaints OSC has received so
far, it appears that AFGE officials have already become politically active
in the 2004 Presidential election and that their message is aimed at the
failure of George W. Bush.
It is evident that organizing and conducting
voter registration drives is significant to AFGE for achieving its political
goals. When one of those goals is the failure of a partisan political
candidate for President, it is clear to us that voter registration is being
used as a tool to further AFGE’s announced political objectives.
In fact, AFGE has a history of using voter
registration as such a tool. Twenty years ago, when OSC first issued an
advisory opinion on this subject, it was apparent that AFGE considered voter
registration a crucial instrument in advancing the campaigns of candidates
it supported. For example, one AFGE official stated, “AFGE National
leadership was not surprised by President Reagan’s announcement to run for
and seek a second term. The battle lines are drawn, and it is time to speak
out! One way to ‘speak-out’ is to vote. If you are not a registered voter
please contact any of our stewards, and we will assist you with voter
registration in this area.” OSC has no evidence that AFGE’s motives for
conducting voter registration have changed, and all indications are that
they remain the same.
We would like to reiterate, however, that the fact that
AFGE uses voter registration as a tool to further its political objectives
no longer means, as it did twenty years ago, that federal employees cannot
participate in its voter registration drives. Because of the 1993 amendments
to the Hatch Act, most federal employees are now able to participate in
partisan voter registration drives, provided that they are not conducted
while on duty, in a government office or building, while wearing an official
uniform or insignia, or using a government vehicle.
At this time, we believe that, for the foregoing
reasons, AFGE is unable to conduct a truly nonpartisan voter registration
drive. As such, the Hatch Act would prohibit federal employees, while on
duty or in their workplace, from participating in a voter registration drive
conducted by AFGE. Please contact OSC attorneys Ana Galindo-Marrone or Erica
Stern at 202-254-3650 if you have additional questions regarding this
matter.
|
Sincerely yours,
___/s/____________________
William E. Reukauf
Associate Special Counsel
for Investigation and Prosecution
|
__________
1However, AFL-CIO has endorsed Senator John Kerry in the 2004 Presidential election. Thus, an argument could be made that because of AFGE’s close affiliation
with AFL-CIO, AFGE has also become identified with the success of Senator Kerry.
2See
AFGE v. O’Connor, 589 F. Supp. 1551 (D.D.C. 1984), vacated,
AFGE v.
O’Connor, 747 F.2d 748 (D.C. Cir. 1984), cert. denied, NTEU v. O’Connor, 474
U.S. 909 (1985).
|
|
| |