Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics, and Physiology Research Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
Publications
Projects
Russian Queen Project Chronology
Reprint List
 

Projects
headline bar
1 - Index Page (scroll down for more information)
2 - A USDA-ARS Project to Evaluate Resistance to
3 - An Importation of Potentially Varroa
4 - Evaluations of the Varroa-resistance of
5 - Resistance to the Parasitic Mite Varroa
6 - Multi-State Field Trials: Varroa Response
7 - Multi-State Field Trials: Honey Production
8 - Multi-State Field Trials: Acarapis Response
9 - The Release of ARS Russian Honey Bees
10 - Hygienic Behavior by Honey Bees from
11 - Well Groomed Bees Resist Tracheal Mites
12 - Well Groomed Bees Resist Tracheal Mites (1998)
13 - Suppression of Mite Reproduction (SMR Trait)
14 - Varroa jacobsoni Reproduction
15 - Population Measurements
16 - The SMR trait explained by hygienic behavior of adult bees
A USDA-ARS Project to Evaluate Resistance to


A USDA-ARS Project to Evaluate Resistance to Varroa jacobsoni by Honey Bees of Far-Eastern Russia

 

 Apis mellifera is not native to the Primorsky Territory on Russia's Pacific coast, but was first moved there in the last century. At that time, pioneers from western Russia took advantage of the completion of the Trans-Siberian Railway and moved bees from European western Russia to the Primorsky Territory in Asian far-eastern Russia. This far-eastern area of Russia is within the natural range of Apis cerana, the original host of Varroa jacobsoni. Thus A. mellifera was brought into the likely range of V. jacobsoni even before the parasite was scientifically described in 1904. This probable long association of V. jacobsoni and A. mellifera in the region has engendered one of the best opportunities in the world for A. mellifera to develop genetic resistance to V. jacobsoni.

The USDA-ARS Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics & Physiology lab, Baton Rouge, LA, explored whether such resistance might be found in Primorye populations of honey bees in the autumn of 1994. Data were collected showing that colonies in the area did have Varroa infestation, but that the levels were lower compared to U.S. colonies.

 

The experimental yard in Khorol, Primorsky, approximately 200 km NW of Valdivostock
 Dr. Victor Kuznetsov (second from left), Dr. Tom Rinderer (middle) and Gary Delatte (right) inspect bees under a microscope for the presence of Varroa.
 The experimental yard in Khorol, Primorsky, approximately 200 km NW of Valdivostock  Dr. Victor Kuznetsov (second from left), Dr. Tom Rinderer (middle) and Gary Delatte (right) inspect bees under a microscope for the presence of Varroa.

 In June 1995, a test apiary was established in Primorsky. Queens from a variety of sources in the territory were introduced into 50 colonies. Mite levels were equalized among colonies, and thereafter no treatments for mite control were undertaken. Between August 1995 and September 1996, monthly infestation rate data for worker and drone brood were collected. For comparison, we ran a test in Baton Rouge, collecting similar data.
 
Russian cooperators, among them Dr. Victor Kusnetsov (right) and Anatoly Reshetnikov (second from left), the beekeeper who managed the experimental colonies used in the project.

Slide of worker brood infestation

Worker brood infestation remained quite low in the Primorsky bees. Even 15 months after the last treatment, the average infestation was only 7%. In the U.S. , 12 months after treatment, the average infestation was 33% and many of the colonies were collapsing with "parasitic mite syndrome". In the summer of 1996, the average infestation in the U.S. colonies rose substantially, but did not rise in the Russian colonies.

 

 

 

A similar difference occurred on drone brood infestations.  In colonies in both areas Varroa infestations were higher in drones.  In Russian colonies, the highest average infestation of 39% occurred in June 1996 and average infestations declined after thereafter.  In U.S. colonies, infestation rates began at 37% and continued to rise to an average of 76% in August 1996.  At this time the colonies were treated with Apistan in order to keep them from dying. Figure of Drone brood infestation
 

Reference to full article:

DANKA, R. G., RINDERER, T. E., KUZNETSOV, V. N., DELATTE, G. T. 1995. A USDA-ARS project to evaluate resistance to Varroa jacobsoni by honey bees of Far-Eastern Russia. American Bee Journal 135: 746-748.

<< Previous    1     [2]     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10     11     12     13     14     15     16     Next >>

   
ARS Products & Services Links
  ARS Products & Services
  TEKTRAN

 
Last Modified: 01/22/2007
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House