TANF FINANACIAL DATA

TANF FINANCIAL DATA

Table A1 - FY 2005 FEDERAL FUNDS SPENT IN FY 2005
SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE IN FY 2005 THROUGH THE FOURTH QUARTER

**Data reported by States in Column A on Form ACF-196 Line Items**

STATE	Line 5 TOTAL EXPENDITURES ON ASSISTANCE	Line 5a BASIC ASSISTANCE	Line 5b CHILD CARE	Line 5c TRANSPORTATION	Line 5d ASSISTANCE UNDER PRIOR LAW	% OF TOTAL EXPENDITURES SPENT ON ASSISTANCE
ALABAMA	18,165,085	17,217,534	0	947,551	0	39%
ALASKA	3,745,876	0	3,257,279	488,597	0	16%
ARIZONA	88,969,946	85,999,203	0	2,970,743	0	51%
ARKANSAS	0	0	0	0	0	0%
CALIFORNIA	1,529,452,582	1,093,028,865	147,040,736	103,455,187	185,927,794	55%
COLORADO	<1,335,415>	<1,335,415>	0	0	0	-2%
CONNECTICUT	11,817,294	7,804,430	0	1,855,478	2,157,386	5%
DELAWARE	23,286,127	15,327,823	305,647	7,652,657	0	84%
DIST.OF COLUMBIA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
FLORIDA	20,084,416	2,578,335	5,741,169	520,569	11,244,343	5%
GEORGIA	7,044,870	252,064	0	6,792,806	0	3%
HAWAII	0	0	0	0	0	0%
IDAHO	1,936,787	1,936,787	0	0	0	11%
ILLINOIS	75,028,871	71,238,915	0	3,789,956	0	13%
INDIANA	61,907,946	61,907,946	0	0	0	44%
IOWA	11,751,126	11,751,126	0	0	0	16%
KANSAS	54,733,360	29,377,351	0	6,733,545	18,622,464	72%
KENTUCKY	5,292,247	3,509,874	1,154,516	627,857	0	6%
LOUISIANA	42,359,688	40,627,109	0	1,732,579	0	37%
MAINE	40,267,638	32,490,383	3,263,054	4,514,201	0	65%
MARYLAND	21,057,286	21,057,286	0	0	0	22%
MASSACHUSETTS	136,719,070	128,888,137	7,691,728	139,205	0	42%
MICHIGAN	118,987,345	85,354,887	33,632,458	0	0	21%
MINNESOTA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
MISSISSIPPI	25,843,834	25,841,369	2,465	0	0	48%
MISSOURI	47,388,387	47,388,387	0	0	0	34%
MONTANA	2,249,922	421,346	0	0	1,828,576	24%
NEBRASKA	25,407,183	25,407,183	0	0	0	59%
NEVADA	2,860,306	2,308,754	0	551,552	0	11%
NEW HAMPSHIRE	272,684	0	0	0	272,684	2%
NEW JERSEY	201,426,480	188,558,731	0	12,867,749	0	60%
NEW MEXICO	24,421,425	23,870,999	0	550,426	0	40%
NEW YORK	953,127,822	679,998,007	0	0	273,129,815	57%
NORTH CAROLINA	91,115,902	89,555,367	0	0	1,560,535	48%
NORTH DAKOTA	1,491,006	465,876	372,105	487,491	165,534	12%
OHIO	2,756,826	13,990	0	2,742,836	0	1%
OKLAHOMA	0	0	0	0	0	0%
OREGON	46,165,247	30,090,519	3,658,190	5,737,493	6,679,045	35%
PENNSYLVANIA	157,716,882	140,178,294	0	17,538,588	0	27%
RHODE ISLAND	56,221,586	56,034,626	0	186,960	0	69%
SOUTH CAROLINA	7,920,347	6,618,161	0	1,302,186	0	11%
SOUTH DAKOTA	9,815,692	0	0	0	9,815,692	66%
TENNESSEE	38,836,610	37,711,646	0	1,124,964	0	52%
TEXAS	52,575,283	0	0	227,240	52,348,043	14%
UTAH	33,572,041	27,442,419	5,000,000	1,129,622	0	51%
VERMONT	26,216,168	23,888,738	0	2,327,430	0	76%
VIRGINIA	53,982,377	53,982,377	0	0	0	41%
WASHINGTON	114,705,670	114,705,670	0	0	0	44%
WEST VIRGINIA	25,161,276	13,604,389	1,508,392	10,048,495	0	29%
WISCONSIN	50,019,645	50,019,645	0	0	0	21%
WYOMING	1,390,719	1,390,719	0	0	0	19%
TOTAL	4,323,933,465	3,348,509,852	212,627,739	199,043,963	563,751,911	-
Percentages 1/	100%	77%	5%	5%	13%	-
Percentages 2/	38%	29%	2%	2%	5%	-

1/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures on assistance.

2/ The percentages shown are calculated as a proportion of total TANF expenditures (Line 7). An abnormal negative
percentage is the result of the total expenditures on assistance being a negative value. An abnormal positive percentage
is the result of total expenditures being less than that of expenditures on assistance.