Departmental Appeals Board
HHS DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD GUIDELINES APPELLATE REVIEW OF RECOMMENDED DECISIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
JUDGES IN INDIAN SELF-DETERMINATION ACT DECLINATIONS
1. Introduction
The Indian Self-Determination Act (ISDA), P.L. 93-638, as amended,
requires that the agency provide a hearing on the record when a tribe
or tribal organization appeals an Indian Health Service (IHS) decision
to decline to enter into a contract pursuant to the ISDA. The hearing
is held by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in the Department of the
Interior, who makes a recommended decision. In October 1994, the ISDA
was amended to require an official above the IHS level, instead of the
Director, IHS, to make the final agency decision. The Secretary has
delegated the authority to make the final decision to the Appellate
Division of the Departmental Appeals Board. A dissatisfied party may
file objections to an ALJ's recommended decision with the Departmental
Appeals Board in accordance with procedures in Part 900, Subpart L of
25 C.F.R. These guidelines have been designed to assist the parties in
understanding and following the procedures relating to Board review.
If you have any questions about these guidelines, you may call Carolyn
Reines-Graubard at 202-565-0116.
2. Starting the Review Process
(a) Any party may file "precise and specific written objections" to
the ALJ's recommended decision within 30 days of receiving the
recommended decision. 25 C.F.R. §900.166. "Filing" means the
date on which your objections are mailed or delivered to the Board.
Objections which are not timely filed will be dismissed. If no
objections are filed or if objections are dismissed as untimely, the
recommended decision becomes final.
(b) Submit your objections to the Department of Health and Human Services, Departmental Appeals Board, MS6127, Appellate Division, 330 Independence Ave., S.W., Cohen Building, Room G-644, Washington, DC 20201.
(c) In order to expedite a fair review, the Board requests that your
written objections --
-
specify any finding of fact with which you disagree,identifying the
finding either by referring to a numbered finding in the
recommended decision or by citing to the page on which the finding
is made;
-
specify any conclusion of law with which you disagree, identifying
the conclusion either by referring to a numbered conclusion or by
citing to the page on which the conclusion is stated;
and
-
explain fully the reasons why you think the finding is unsupported
or the conclusion is wrong.
Please state each argument concisely and set it forth in a separate
paragraph or section. Where appropriate, each argument should be
supported by precise citations to the record before the ALJ. You do not
need to submit materials already in the record.
(d) Provide an original and two copies of your objections to the Board
and a copy to the opposing party. Include in your submission to the
Board a statement that you have sent a copy to the opposing party.
3. The Review Process at the Board
(a) Upon receipt of written objections, the Chair will appoint a
deciding official to hear the objections and provide such other
process as deemed necessary. The deciding official will be assisted by
a staff attorney who also functions as the parties' contact for
questions about case status and procedures.
(b) The Board will review only those parts of the record before the
ALJ which are cited in the written objections or which the Board
considers necessary to decide the appeal. The Board will not consider
issues not raised in the written objections, nor issues which could
have been presented to the ALJ but were not.
(c) The Board has 20 days from the date it receives any timely written
objections to modify, adopt, or reverse the recommended decision. If
the Board does not take any of these actions during that time, the
recommended decision automatically becomes final.
|